LIVKX vs. FFFCX
LIVKX (BlackRock LifePath Index 2055 Class K) and FFFCX (Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Over the past 10 years, LIVKX returned 11.60%/yr vs 5.54%/yr for FFFCX. Their correlation of 0.89 means they have usually moved in the same direction. LIVKX charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for FFFCX.
Performance
LIVKX vs. FFFCX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LIVKX achieves a 11.38% return, which is significantly higher than FFFCX's 4.31% return. Over the past 10 years, LIVKX has outperformed FFFCX with an annualized return of 11.60%, while FFFCX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.54% annualized return.
LIVKX
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- -0.25%
- 6M
- 7.43%
- YTD
- 11.38%
- 1Y
- 23.64%
- 3Y*
- 17.08%
- 5Y*
- 9.79%
- 10Y*
- 11.60%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.36%
FFFCX
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- -0.65%
- 6M
- 2.78%
- YTD
- 4.31%
- 1Y
- 8.92%
- 3Y*
- 8.23%
- 5Y*
- 3.26%
- 10Y*
- 5.54%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.01%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
LIVKX vs. FFFCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LIVKX BlackRock LifePath Index 2055 Class K | 11.38% | 21.57% | 13.65% | 21.61% | -18.33% | 18.87% | 14.98% | 26.90% | -7.84% | 21.51% |
FFFCX Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund | 4.31% | 11.39% | 5.26% | 9.82% | -13.21% | 5.64% | 11.09% | 14.34% | -3.74% | 12.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between LIVKX and FFFCX is 0.90, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.81 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.81 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 1, 2011 | 0.89 |
The correlation between LIVKX and FFFCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LIVKX vs. FFFCX — Risk / Return Rank
LIVKX
FFFCX
LIVKX vs. FFFCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock LifePath Index 2055 Class K (LIVKX) and Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund (FFFCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LIVKX | FFFCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.32 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.37 | 2.30 | +0.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.93 | 9.28 | +0.65 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LIVKX vs. FFFCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LIVKX drawdown since its inception was -34.39%, smaller than the maximum FFFCX drawdown of -36.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LIVKX and FFFCX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LIVKX | FFFCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.39% | -36.88% | +2.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.44% | -4.00% | -5.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.46% | -4.77% | -12.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.44% | -18.35% | -8.09% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.39% | -18.35% | -16.04% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.55% | -1.17% | -0.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.48% | -4.55% | +0.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.25% | 0.99% | +1.26% |
Volatility
LIVKX vs. FFFCX - Volatility Comparison
BlackRock LifePath Index 2055 Class K (LIVKX) has a higher volatility of 3.88% compared to Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund (FFFCX) at 1.73%. This indicates that LIVKX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FFFCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LIVKX | FFFCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.88% | 1.73% | +2.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.49% | 4.92% | +6.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.72% | 5.59% | +8.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.01% | 6.49% | +9.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.70% | 6.27% | +10.43% |
LIVKX vs. FFFCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LIVKX has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than FFFCX's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
LIVKX vs. FFFCX - Dividend Comparison
LIVKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.33%, less than FFFCX's 4.70% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FFFCX Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund | 4.70% | 4.97% | 2.99% | 2.72% | 7.23% | 9.33% | 6.01% | 5.78% | 6.98% | 4.82% | 3.22% | 3.68% |
LIVKX BlackRock LifePath Index 2055 Class K | 2.33% | 2.53% | 0.01% | 2.08% | 2.02% | 2.08% | 1.61% | 3.00% | 2.40% | 2.31% | 1.57% | 2.93% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, LIVKX and FFFCX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
LIVKX has higher volatility (3.88%) compared to FFFCX (1.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LIVKX dropped -34.39% vs FFFCX's -36.88%.
FFFCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LIVKX and FFFCX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer