LITX vs. XDSQ
LITX (Tradr 2X Long LITE Daily ETF) and XDSQ (Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.29 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. LITX charges 1.49%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for XDSQ.
Performance
LITX vs. XDSQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
LITX
- 1D
- 5.60%
- 1M
- -12.69%
- 6M
- 78.91%
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
XDSQ
- 1D
- 1.09%
- 1M
- 1.17%
- 6M
- 2.50%
- YTD
- 4.06%
- 1Y
- 14.72%
- 3Y*
- 13.83%
- 5Y*
- 9.46%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 10.43%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $72.96M | $66.22M | $208.61M | |
| $337.95K | $898.70K | $479.40K |
LITX vs. XDSQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
LITX Tradr 2X Long LITE Daily ETF | 126.81% |
XDSQ Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF | 2.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between LITX and XDSQ is 0.29, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2026 | 0.29 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LITX vs. XDSQ — Risk / Return Rank
LITX
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
XDSQ
LITX vs. XDSQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long LITE Daily ETF (LITX) and Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF (XDSQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LITX | XDSQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.24 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.36 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 6.43 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LITX vs. XDSQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LITX drawdown since its inception was -73.97%, which is greater than XDSQ's maximum drawdown of -26.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LITX and XDSQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LITX | XDSQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.97% | -26.06% | -47.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.60% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.15% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.06% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -63.99% | -0.31% | -63.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.05% | -4.83% | -20.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.03% | — |
Volatility
LITX vs. XDSQ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LITX | XDSQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.54% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.13% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 198.72% | 10.98% | +187.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 198.72% | 15.29% | +183.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 198.72% | 14.95% | +183.77% |
LITX vs. XDSQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
LITX has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is higher than XDSQ's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
LITX vs. XDSQ - Dividend Comparison
Neither LITX nor XDSQ has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
LITX and XDSQ have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XDSQ is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XDSQ is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.49% for LITX.
LITX and XDSQ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Tradr and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 1.49% for LITX and 0.79% for XDSQ.
Find the right allocation for LITX and XDSQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer