PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LITX vs. QQQP
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

LITX vs. QQQP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long LITE Daily ETF (LITX) and Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Quarterly ETF (QQQP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

LITX vs. QQQP - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period


LITX

1D
17.74%
1M
-18.38%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QQQP

1D
2.43%
1M
-8.61%
YTD
-11.26%
6M
-9.55%
1Y
39.25%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


LITX vs. QQQP - Expense Ratio Comparison

LITX has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQP's 1.30% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

LITX vs. QQQP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LITX

QQQP
QQQP Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
QQQP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQP Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQP Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LITX vs. QQQP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long LITE Daily ETF (LITX) and Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Quarterly ETF (QQQP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

LITX vs. QQQP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LITXQQQPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

446.90

0.40

+446.49

Correlation

The correlation between LITX and QQQP is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

LITX vs. QQQP - Dividend Comparison

Neither LITX nor QQQP has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

LITX vs. QQQP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LITX drawdown since its inception was -51.46%, which is greater than QQQP's maximum drawdown of -42.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LITX and QQQP.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


LITXQQQPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.46%

-42.50%

-8.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.38%

-17.71%

-0.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.37%

-7.83%

-7.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.38%

Volatility

LITX vs. QQQP - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


LITXQQQPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

207.09%

47.01%

+160.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

207.09%

44.93%

+162.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

207.09%

44.93%

+162.16%