PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LITX vs. QQQP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LITX vs. QQQP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long LITE Daily ETF (LITX) and Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Quarterly ETF (QQQP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


LITX

1D
9.82%
1M
-17.69%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QQQP

1D
-0.56%
1M
4.47%
YTD
33.67%
6M
31.35%
1Y
73.51%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LITX vs. QQQP - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between LITX and QQQP is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2026

0.31

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LITX vs. QQQP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LITX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


QQQP
QQQP Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
QQQP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQP Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQP Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LITX vs. QQQP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long LITE Daily ETF (LITX) and Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Quarterly ETF (QQQP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LITXQQQPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.48

LITX vs. QQQP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LITX vs. QQQP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LITX drawdown since its inception was -51.46%, which is greater than QQQP's maximum drawdown of -42.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LITX and QQQP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LITXQQQPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.46%

-42.50%

-8.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-35.78%

-1.94%

-33.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.83%

-7.26%

-9.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.04%

Volatility

LITX vs. QQQP - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LITXQQQPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

195.89%

34.24%

+161.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

195.89%

44.27%

+151.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

195.89%

44.27%

+151.62%

LITX vs. QQQP - Expense Ratio Comparison

LITX has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQP's 1.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

LITX vs. QQQP - Dividend Comparison

Neither LITX nor QQQP has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


LITX and QQQP have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, QQQP is cheaper at 1.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QQQP is cheaper with a 1.30% expense ratio, compared with 1.49% for LITX.

LITX and QQQP have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

Their fees differ too: 1.49% for LITX and 1.30% for QQQP.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LITX and QQQP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer