LITX vs. COTG
LITX (Tradr 2X Long LITE Daily ETF) and COTG (Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their -0.19 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. LITX charges 1.49%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for COTG.
Performance
LITX vs. COTG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
LITX
- 1D
- 5.60%
- 1M
- -12.69%
- 6M
- 78.91%
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
COTG
- 1D
- -0.68%
- 1M
- -0.88%
- 6M
- -3.87%
- YTD
- 12.60%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $653.21K | $1.05M | $1.51M | |
| $72.96M | $66.22M | $208.61M |
LITX vs. COTG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
LITX Tradr 2X Long LITE Daily ETF | 126.81% |
COTG Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF | -11.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between LITX and COTG is -0.19, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2026 | -0.19 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LITX vs. COTG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long LITE Daily ETF (LITX) and Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF (COTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LITX vs. COTG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LITX drawdown since its inception was -73.97%, which is greater than COTG's maximum drawdown of -32.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LITX and COTG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LITX | COTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.97% | -32.16% | -41.81% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -63.99% | -26.56% | -37.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.05% | -11.97% | -13.08% |
Volatility
LITX vs. COTG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LITX | COTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 198.72% | 40.99% | +157.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 198.72% | 40.99% | +157.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 198.72% | 40.99% | +157.73% |
LITX vs. COTG - Expense Ratio Comparison
LITX has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is higher than COTG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
LITX vs. COTG - Dividend Comparison
Neither LITX nor COTG has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
LITX and COTG have a correlation of -0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, COTG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
COTG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.49% for LITX.
LITX and COTG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Tradr and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.49% for LITX and 0.75% for COTG.
Find the right allocation for LITX and COTG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer