LITP vs. PBOG
LITP (Sprott Lithium Miners ETF) and PBOG (Portfolio Building Block Integrated Oil & Gas and Exploration & Production Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LITP is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq Sprott Lithium Miners Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while PBOG is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the BITA Global Oil & Gas Select Index. Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. LITP charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for PBOG.
Performance
LITP vs. PBOG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LITP achieves a 28.96% return, which is significantly lower than PBOG's 32.22% return.
LITP
- 1D
- -4.66%
- 1M
- -7.17%
- YTD
- 28.96%
- 6M
- 41.58%
- 1Y
- 218.79%
- 3Y*
- -0.12%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PBOG
- 1D
- 1.23%
- 1M
- -2.32%
- YTD
- 32.22%
- 6M
- 29.70%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LITP vs. PBOG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
LITP Sprott Lithium Miners ETF | 28.96% | 12.72% |
PBOG Portfolio Building Block Integrated Oil & Gas and Exploration & Production Index ETF | 32.22% | 1.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between LITP and PBOG is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 26, 2025 | -0.01 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LITP vs. PBOG — Risk / Return Rank
LITP
PBOG
LITP vs. PBOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Lithium Miners ETF (LITP) and Portfolio Building Block Integrated Oil & Gas and Exploration & Production Index ETF (PBOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LITP | PBOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.78 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.67 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.08 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 21.48 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LITP | PBOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.78 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.07 | 3.31 | -3.38 |
Drawdowns
LITP vs. PBOG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LITP drawdown since its inception was -74.72%, which is greater than PBOG's maximum drawdown of -11.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LITP and PBOG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LITP | PBOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.72% | -11.45% | -63.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.12% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -74.31% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.47% | -6.81% | -7.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -42.29% | -3.10% | -39.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.23% | — | — |
Volatility
LITP vs. PBOG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LITP | PBOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.36% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 39.69% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 58.34% | 23.67% | +34.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 47.34% | 23.67% | +23.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 47.34% | 23.67% | +23.67% |
LITP vs. PBOG - Expense Ratio Comparison
LITP has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than PBOG's 0.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
LITP vs. PBOG - Dividend Comparison
LITP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.74%, more than PBOG's 0.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
LITP Sprott Lithium Miners ETF | 5.74% | 7.41% | 6.55% | 2.80% |
PBOG Portfolio Building Block Integrated Oil & Gas and Exploration & Production Index ETF | 0.13% | 0.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LITP and PBOG have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PBOG is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PBOG is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for LITP.
LITP has the higher dividend yield at 5.74%, compared with 0.13% for PBOG.
LITP is categorized as Energy Equities, while PBOG is Oil & Gas. LITP tracks Nasdaq Sprott Lithium Miners Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while PBOG tracks BITA Global Oil & Gas Select Index. They also come from different issuers: Sprott and Portfolio Building Blocks. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for LITP and 0.13% for PBOG.
Find the right allocation for LITP and PBOG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer