LITP vs. CRAK
Compare and contrast key facts about Sprott Lithium Miners ETF (LITP) and VanEck Oil Refiners ETF (CRAK).
LITP and CRAK are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. LITP is a passively managed fund by Sprott that tracks the performance of the Nasdaq Sprott Lithium Miners Index - Benchmark TR Gross. It was launched on Feb 1, 2023. CRAK is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the MVIS Global Oil Refiners. It was launched on Aug 18, 2015. Both LITP and CRAK are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
LITP vs. CRAK - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
LITP vs. CRAK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
LITP Sprott Lithium Miners ETF | 10.13% | 94.65% | -43.85% | -36.14% |
CRAK VanEck Oil Refiners ETF | 31.71% | 39.11% | -15.05% | 10.91% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LITP achieves a 10.13% return, which is significantly lower than CRAK's 31.71% return.
LITP
- 1D
- 2.47%
- 1M
- -5.35%
- YTD
- 10.13%
- 6M
- 58.57%
- 1Y
- 140.65%
- 3Y*
- -2.71%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CRAK
- 1D
- 0.80%
- 1M
- 10.12%
- YTD
- 31.71%
- 6M
- 37.36%
- 1Y
- 75.35%
- 3Y*
- 20.21%
- 5Y*
- 16.07%
- 10Y*
- 12.53%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LITP vs. CRAK - Expense Ratio Comparison
LITP has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than CRAK's 0.60% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
LITP vs. CRAK — Risk / Return Rank
LITP
CRAK
LITP vs. CRAK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Lithium Miners ETF (LITP) and VanEck Oil Refiners ETF (CRAK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LITP | CRAK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.42 | 3.63 | -1.21 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.83 | 4.38 | -1.55 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.66 | -0.32 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.17 | 4.91 | -0.74 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.52 | 21.23 | -8.71 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LITP | CRAK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.42 | 3.63 | -1.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.79 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.57 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.17 | 0.54 | -0.71 |
Correlation
The correlation between LITP and CRAK is 0.37, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
LITP vs. CRAK - Dividend Comparison
LITP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.73%, more than CRAK's 1.53% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LITP Sprott Lithium Miners ETF | 6.73% | 7.41% | 6.55% | 2.80% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CRAK VanEck Oil Refiners ETF | 1.53% | 2.02% | 5.60% | 3.65% | 3.08% | 2.40% | 2.64% | 1.49% | 2.42% | 1.66% | 3.42% | 0.47% |
Drawdowns
LITP vs. CRAK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LITP drawdown since its inception was -74.72%, which is greater than CRAK's maximum drawdown of -58.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LITP and CRAK.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| LITP | CRAK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.72% | -58.80% | -15.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.12% | -15.07% | -16.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -35.61% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -58.80% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.14% | 0.00% | -23.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -44.08% | -12.64% | -31.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.37% | 3.49% | +6.88% |
Volatility
LITP vs. CRAK - Volatility Comparison
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF (LITP) has a higher volatility of 18.81% compared to VanEck Oil Refiners ETF (CRAK) at 5.52%. This indicates that LITP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CRAK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| LITP | CRAK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.81% | 5.52% | +13.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 44.10% | 13.47% | +30.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 58.79% | 20.89% | +37.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 47.29% | 20.44% | +26.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 47.29% | 22.10% | +25.19% |