LITP vs. BKGI

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Sprott Lithium Miners ETF (LITP) and Bny Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF (BKGI).

LITP and BKGI are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. LITP is a passively managed fund by Sprott that tracks the performance of the Nasdaq Sprott Lithium Miners Index - Benchmark TR Gross. It was launched on Feb 1, 2023. BKGI is an actively managed fund by BNY Mellon. It was launched on Nov 2, 2022.

Performance

LITP vs. BKGI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sprott Lithium Miners ETF (LITP) and Bny Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF (BKGI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

LITP vs. BKGI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
LITP Sprott Lithium Miners ETF	10.13%	94.65%	-43.85%	-36.14%
BKGI Bny Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF	10.41%	37.53%	12.35%	2.46%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with LITP having a 10.13% return and BKGI slightly higher at 10.41%.

LITP

• 1D: 2.47%
• 1M: -5.35%
• YTD: 10.13%
• 6M: 58.57%
• 1Y: 140.65%
• 3Y*: -2.71%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BKGI

• 1D: 1.11%
• 1M: -3.70%
• YTD: 10.41%
• 6M: 15.93%
• 1Y: 32.81%
• 3Y*: 21.60%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LITP vs. BKGI - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both LITP and BKGI have an expense ratio of 0.65%.

LITP

Sprott Lithium Miners ETF

BKGI

Bny Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF

Return for Risk

LITP vs. BKGI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LITP

LITP Risk / Return Rank: 92
LITP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
LITP Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
LITP Omega Ratio Rank: 86
LITP Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
LITP Martin Ratio Rank: 92

BKGI

BKGI Risk / Return Rank: 94
BKGI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
BKGI Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
BKGI Omega Ratio Rank: 95
BKGI Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
BKGI Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LITP vs. BKGI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Lithium Miners ETF (LITP) and Bny Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF (BKGI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LITP	BKGI	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.42	2.25	+0.17
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.83	2.84	-0.01
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.46	-0.12
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.17	3.13	+1.04
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	12.52	15.90	-3.39
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LITP vs. BKGI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LITP Sharpe Ratio is 2.42, which is comparable to the BKGI Sharpe Ratio of 2.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LITP and BKGI, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LITP	BKGI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.42	2.25	+0.17
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.17	1.66	-1.83

Correlation

The correlation between LITP and BKGI is 0.31, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

LITP vs. BKGI - Dividend Comparison

LITP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.73%, more than BKGI's 2.40% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
LITP Sprott Lithium Miners ETF	6.73%	7.41%	6.55%	2.80%	0.00%
BKGI Bny Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF	2.40%	2.65%	4.55%	4.55%	0.53%

Drawdowns

LITP vs. BKGI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LITP drawdown since its inception was -74.72%, which is greater than BKGI's maximum drawdown of -14.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LITP and BKGI.

Drawdown Indicators

	LITP	BKGI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-74.72%	-14.79%	-59.93%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-31.12%	-10.35%	-20.77%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-23.14%	-3.76%	-19.38%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-44.08%	-2.60%	-41.48%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.37%	2.04%	+8.33%

Volatility

LITP vs. BKGI - Volatility Comparison

Sprott Lithium Miners ETF (LITP) has a higher volatility of 18.81% compared to Bny Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF (BKGI) at 4.74%. This indicates that LITP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BKGI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LITP	BKGI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	18.81%	4.74%	+14.07%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	44.10%	7.91%	+36.19%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	58.79%	14.67%	+44.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	47.29%	14.07%	+33.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	47.29%	14.07%	+33.22%