PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LIT vs. EMXC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LIT vs. EMXC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LIT achieves a 27.00% return, which is significantly lower than EMXC's 37.25% return.


LIT

1D
2.02%
1M
-8.05%
YTD
27.00%
6M
29.31%
1Y
120.44%
3Y*
9.00%
5Y*
4.01%
10Y*
14.53%

EMXC

1D
0.55%
1M
3.75%
YTD
37.25%
6M
42.23%
1Y
65.26%
3Y*
26.47%
5Y*
12.14%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LIT vs. EMXC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LIT
Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
27.00%60.05%-19.19%-12.18%-29.91%36.74%127.88%3.27%-28.63%28.88%
EMXC
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF
37.25%35.14%2.68%18.96%-19.56%8.54%12.76%15.80%-12.96%7.16%

Correlation

The correlation between LIT and EMXC is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2017

0.60

The correlation between LIT and EMXC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

LIT vs. EMXC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
LIT
EMXC

Basic Materials

55.4%
6.8%

Industrials

26.0%
8.3%

Technology

11.5%
45.0%

Consumer Cyclical

7.0%
4.5%

Communication Services

-

3.4%

Consumer Defensive

-

2.9%

Energy

-

4.2%

Financial Services

-

19.6%

Healthcare

-

2.2%

Real Estate

-

1.0%

Utilities

-

2.3%

Basic Materials

LIT
55.4%
EMXC
6.8%

Industrials

LIT
26.0%
EMXC
8.3%

Technology

LIT
11.5%
EMXC
45.0%

Consumer Cyclical

LIT
7.0%
EMXC
4.5%

Communication Services

LIT

-

EMXC
3.4%

Consumer Defensive

LIT

-

EMXC
2.9%

Energy

LIT

-

EMXC
4.2%

Financial Services

LIT

-

EMXC
19.6%

Healthcare

LIT

-

EMXC
2.2%

Real Estate

LIT

-

EMXC
1.0%

Utilities

LIT

-

EMXC
2.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LIT vs. EMXC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LIT
LIT Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
LIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
LIT Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
LIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
LIT Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

EMXC
EMXC Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
EMXC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMXC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMXC Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
EMXC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMXC Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LIT vs. EMXC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LITEMXCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.50

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.36

4.55

+2.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

27.27

17.51

+9.75

LIT vs. EMXC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LIT Sharpe Ratio is 3.57, which is higher than the EMXC Sharpe Ratio of 2.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LIT and EMXC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LIT vs. EMXC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LIT drawdown since its inception was -65.91%, which is greater than EMXC's maximum drawdown of -42.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LIT and EMXC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LITEMXCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.91%

-42.81%

-23.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.46%

-14.41%

-2.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-53.01%

-19.12%

-33.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-65.91%

-28.91%

-37.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-65.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.21%

-4.12%

-7.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-33.59%

-10.17%

-23.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.45%

3.74%

+0.71%

Volatility

LIT vs. EMXC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT) is 11.56%, while iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC) has a volatility of 12.83%. This indicates that LIT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMXC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LITEMXCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.56%

12.83%

-1.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.80%

21.90%

+1.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

33.94%

23.90%

+10.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.04%

18.00%

+14.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.77%

20.07%

+10.70%

LIT vs. EMXC - Expense Ratio Comparison

LIT has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than EMXC's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

LIT vs. EMXC - Dividend Comparison

LIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%, less than EMXC's 2.05% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EMXC
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF
2.05%2.82%2.69%1.83%2.85%1.78%1.45%3.25%2.63%0.99%0.00%0.00%
LIT
Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
0.38%0.49%0.93%1.11%0.99%0.22%0.40%1.85%2.52%3.26%2.15%0.24%

Frequently Asked Questions


LIT and EMXC have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EMXC has higher volatility (12.83%) compared to LIT (11.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LIT dropped -65.91% vs EMXC's -42.81%.

On 5-year performance, EMXC leads with 12.14% vs 4.01% for LIT. On fees, EMXC is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, LIT has been the lower-risk option at 11.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, EMXC has performed better with a 12.14% return vs 4.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EMXC is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for LIT.

EMXC has the higher dividend yield at 2.05%, compared with 0.38% for LIT.

LIT is categorized as Commodity Producers Equities, while EMXC is Emerging Markets Equities. LIT tracks Solactive Global Lithium Index, while EMXC tracks MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for LIT and 0.49% for EMXC.

LIT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.57 vs 2.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LIT and EMXC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer