LIT vs. DTCR
LIT (Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF) and DTCR (Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LIT is a Lithium & Battery Metals fund tracking the Solactive Global Lithium Index, while DTCR is a REIT fund tracking the Solactive Data Center REITs & Digital Infrastructure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, LIT returned 3.06%/yr vs 14.82%/yr for DTCR. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LIT charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for DTCR.
Performance
LIT vs. DTCR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LIT achieves a 20.92% return, which is significantly lower than DTCR's 49.19% return.
LIT
- 1D
- -5.01%
- 1M
- -8.03%
- YTD
- 20.92%
- 6M
- 17.98%
- 1Y
- 114.29%
- 3Y*
- 8.82%
- 5Y*
- 3.06%
- 10Y*
- 14.22%
DTCR
- 1D
- -3.02%
- 1M
- 3.31%
- YTD
- 49.19%
- 6M
- 51.34%
- 1Y
- 73.85%
- 3Y*
- 35.46%
- 5Y*
- 14.82%
- 10Y*
- —
LIT vs. DTCR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LIT Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF | 20.92% | 60.05% | -19.19% | -12.18% | -29.91% | 36.74% | 46.84% |
DTCR Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF | 49.19% | 28.99% | 14.92% | 18.93% | -30.89% | 20.35% | 6.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between LIT and DTCR is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2020 | 0.50 |
The correlation between LIT and DTCR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.47 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LIT vs. DTCR — Risk / Return Rank
LIT
DTCR
LIT vs. DTCR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT) and Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF (DTCR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LIT | DTCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.51 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.98 | 5.76 | +1.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 24.36 | 17.72 | +6.64 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LIT vs. DTCR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LIT drawdown since its inception was -65.91%, which is greater than DTCR's maximum drawdown of -38.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LIT and DTCR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LIT | DTCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.91% | -38.98% | -26.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.46% | -12.89% | -3.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -53.01% | -24.96% | -28.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -65.91% | -38.98% | -26.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -65.91% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.46% | -3.02% | -12.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -33.56% | -12.28% | -21.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.71% | 4.18% | +0.53% |
Volatility
LIT vs. DTCR - Volatility Comparison
Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT) has a higher volatility of 11.76% compared to Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF (DTCR) at 9.71%. This indicates that LIT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DTCR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LIT | DTCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.76% | 9.71% | +2.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.39% | 18.51% | +5.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.30% | 23.26% | +11.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.09% | 22.15% | +9.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.75% | 22.10% | +8.65% |
LIT vs. DTCR - Expense Ratio Comparison
LIT has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than DTCR's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
LIT vs. DTCR - Dividend Comparison
LIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.40%, less than DTCR's 0.74% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DTCR Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF | 0.74% | 1.10% | 1.72% | 1.18% | 2.57% | 1.27% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LIT Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF | 0.40% | 0.49% | 0.93% | 1.11% | 0.99% | 0.22% | 0.40% | 1.85% | 2.52% | 3.26% | 2.15% | 0.24% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LIT and DTCR have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LIT has higher volatility (11.76%) compared to DTCR (9.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LIT dropped -65.91% vs DTCR's -38.98%.
On 5-year performance, DTCR leads with 14.82% vs 3.06% for LIT. On fees, DTCR is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, DTCR has been the lower-risk option at 9.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DTCR has performed better with a 14.82% return vs 3.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DTCR is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for LIT.
DTCR has the higher dividend yield at 0.74%, compared with 0.40% for LIT.
LIT is categorized as Lithium & Battery Metals, while DTCR is REIT. LIT tracks Solactive Global Lithium Index, while DTCR tracks Solactive Data Center REITs & Digital Infrastructure Index. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for LIT and 0.50% for DTCR.
LIT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.35 vs 3.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LIT and DTCR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer