DRIV vs. MOTO

Last updated Jul 28, 2026

DRIV (Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF) and MOTO (SmartETFs Smart Transportation & Technology ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DRIV is a Global Equities fund tracking the Solactive Autonomous & Electric Vehicles Index, while MOTO is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Guinness Atkinson Asset Management. DRIV is passively managed, while MOTO is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, DRIV returned 4.90%/yr vs 7.89%/yr for MOTO. Their correlation of 0.92 means they have usually moved in the same direction. Both charge a 0.68% expense ratio.

Performance

DRIV vs. MOTO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF (DRIV) and SmartETFs Smart Transportation & Technology ETF (MOTO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with DRIV having a 13.45% return and MOTO slightly higher at 13.93%.

DRIV

• 1D: 0.14%
• 1M: -9.42%
• 6M: 2.21%
• YTD: 13.45%
• 1Y: 34.04%
• 3Y*: 8.29%
• 5Y*: 4.90%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 11.52%

MOTO

• 1D: -0.26%
• 1M: -3.24%
• 6M: 5.61%
• YTD: 13.93%
• 1Y: 23.67%
• 3Y*: 12.33%
• 5Y*: 7.89%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 15.88%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
DRIV Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF	$1.00M	$1.79M	$2.96M
MOTO SmartETFs Smart Transportation & Technology ETF	$18.04K	$15.39K	$17.55K

DRIV vs. MOTO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
DRIV Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF	13.45%	30.42%	-5.04%	26.14%	-34.13%	27.80%	62.76%	4.88%
MOTO SmartETFs Smart Transportation & Technology ETF	13.93%	27.38%	2.01%	27.10%	-27.20%	17.22%	59.13%	5.00%

Correlation

The correlation between DRIV and MOTO is 0.90, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.90
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.91
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 15, 2019	0.92

The correlation between DRIV and MOTO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

DRIV vs. MOTO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DRIV	MOTO
Technology	40.9%	43.0%
Consumer Cyclical	23.8%	23.7%
Industrials	17.5%	15.3%
Basic Materials	11.5%	3.8%
Communication Services	6.3%	4.4%
Consumer Defensive	-	2.3%
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	1.0%
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	0.7%

Return for Risk

DRIV vs. MOTO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DRIV

DRIV Risk / Return Rank: 46
DRIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
DRIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
DRIV Omega Ratio Rank: 46
DRIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
DRIV Martin Ratio Rank: 47

MOTO

MOTO Risk / Return Rank: 42
MOTO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
MOTO Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
MOTO Omega Ratio Rank: 38
MOTO Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
MOTO Martin Ratio Rank: 43

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DRIV vs. MOTO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF (DRIV) and SmartETFs Smart Transportation & Technology ETF (MOTO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DRIV	MOTO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.18	0.99	+0.19
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.65	1.44	+0.21
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.18	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.61	1.78	-0.16
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.40	4.75	+0.65

DRIV vs. MOTO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DRIV Sharpe Ratio is 1.18, which is comparable to the MOTO Sharpe Ratio of 0.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DRIV and MOTO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DRIV vs. MOTO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DRIV drawdown since its inception was -41.93%, which is greater than MOTO's maximum drawdown of -38.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRIV and MOTO.

Drawdown Indicators

	DRIV	MOTO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.93%	-38.24%	-3.69%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.20%	-13.37%	-7.83%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-34.18%	-26.43%	-7.75%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-41.93%	-37.34%	-4.59%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-21.09%	-13.37%	-7.72%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.08%	-9.93%	-5.15%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.33%	5.00%	+1.33%

Volatility

DRIV vs. MOTO - Volatility Comparison

Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF (DRIV) has a higher volatility of 10.11% compared to SmartETFs Smart Transportation & Technology ETF (MOTO) at 7.80%. This indicates that DRIV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MOTO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DRIV	MOTO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.11%	7.80%	+2.31%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	24.16%	20.16%	+4.00%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	29.04%	24.04%	+5.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.84%	24.15%	+3.69%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.71%	26.46%	+1.25%

DRIV vs. MOTO - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both DRIV and MOTO have an expense ratio of 0.68%.

Dividends

DRIV vs. MOTO - Dividend Comparison

DRIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, less than MOTO's 0.93% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
DRIV Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF	0.65%	1.07%	2.07%	1.62%	1.24%	0.32%	0.29%	1.23%	2.79%
MOTO SmartETFs Smart Transportation & Technology ETF	0.93%	1.06%	1.07%	2.73%	2.33%	0.55%	2.71%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DRIV and MOTO in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.90, DRIV and MOTO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, DRIV or MOTO?

DRIV has higher volatility (10.11%) compared to MOTO (7.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DRIV dropped -41.93% vs MOTO's -38.24%.

Which ETF is better, DRIV or MOTO?

On 5-year performance, MOTO leads with 7.89% vs 4.90% for DRIV. Both ETFs have the same 0.68% expense ratio. On volatility, MOTO has been the lower-risk option at 7.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DRIV or MOTO?

Over the 5-year period, MOTO has performed better with a 7.89% return vs 4.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DRIV or MOTO?

DRIV and MOTO have the same expense ratio: 0.68% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DRIV or MOTO?

MOTO has the higher dividend yield at 0.93%, compared with 0.65% for DRIV.

What is the main difference between DRIV and MOTO?

DRIV is categorized as Global Equities, while MOTO is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Guinness Atkinson Asset Management.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DRIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.18 vs 0.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.