LIT vs. BITI

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

LIT (Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF) and BITI (ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LIT is a Lithium & Battery Metals fund tracking the Solactive Global Lithium Index, while BITI is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Bloomberg Bitcoin Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, LIT returned 1.61%/yr vs -31.62%/yr for BITI. At a correlation of -0.31, they often move in opposite directions. LIT charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.03%/yr for BITI.

Performance

LIT vs. BITI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT) and ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LIT achieves a 6.62% return, which is significantly lower than BITI's 24.48% return.

LIT

• 1D: -3.10%
• 1M: -17.28%
• 6M: -2.40%
• YTD: 6.62%
• 1Y: 74.54%
• 3Y*: 1.61%
• 5Y*: -1.44%
• 10Y*: 11.98%

BITI

• 1D: 1.13%
• 1M: 1.49%
• 6M: 35.86%
• YTD: 24.48%
• 1Y: 64.61%
• 3Y*: -31.62%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LIT vs. BITI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
LIT Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF	6.62%	60.05%	-19.19%	-12.18%	-18.20%
BITI ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF	24.48%	-1.76%	-62.60%	-66.17%	3.39%

Correlation

The correlation between LIT and BITI is -0.32, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.32
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.27
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2022	-0.31

Return for Risk

LIT vs. BITI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LIT

LIT Risk / Return Rank: 77
LIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
LIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
LIT Omega Ratio Rank: 73
LIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
LIT Martin Ratio Rank: 76

BITI

BITI Risk / Return Rank: 52
BITI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
BITI Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
BITI Omega Ratio Rank: 46
BITI Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
BITI Martin Ratio Rank: 48

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LIT vs. BITI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT) and ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LIT	BITI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.17	1.47	+0.70
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.71	2.04	+0.67
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.25	+0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.06	2.57	+0.49
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.23	6.38	+4.86

LIT vs. BITI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LIT Sharpe Ratio is 2.17, which is higher than the BITI Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LIT and BITI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LIT vs. BITI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LIT drawdown since its inception was -65.91%, smaller than the maximum BITI drawdown of -92.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LIT and BITI.

Drawdown Indicators

	LIT	BITI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-65.91%	-92.16%	+26.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-24.52%	-25.28%	+0.76%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-52.25%	-84.63%	+32.38%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-65.91%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-65.91%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-25.45%	-86.41%	+60.96%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-33.50%	-68.40%	+34.90%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.66%	10.16%	-3.50%

Volatility

LIT vs. BITI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT) is 8.66%, while ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI) has a volatility of 10.76%. This indicates that LIT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BITI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LIT	BITI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.66%	10.76%	-2.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	24.70%	34.28%	-9.58%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	34.54%	44.15%	-9.61%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	32.07%	52.24%	-20.17%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	30.74%	52.24%	-21.50%

LIT vs. BITI - Expense Ratio Comparison

LIT has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than BITI's 1.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

LIT vs. BITI - Dividend Comparison

LIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, less than BITI's 15.62% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BITI ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF	15.62%	1.60%	3.91%	3.33%	0.06%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
LIT Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF	0.73%	0.49%	0.93%	1.11%	0.99%	0.22%	0.40%	1.85%	2.52%	3.26%	2.15%	0.24%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LIT and BITI in my portfolio?

LIT and BITI have a correlation of -0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LIT or BITI?

BITI has higher volatility (10.76%) compared to LIT (8.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LIT dropped -65.91% vs BITI's -92.16%.

Which ETF is better, LIT or BITI?

On 3-year performance, LIT leads with 1.61% vs -31.62% for BITI. On fees, LIT is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, LIT has been the lower-risk option at 8.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, LIT or BITI?

Over the 3-year period, LIT has performed better with a 1.61% return vs -31.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, LIT or BITI?

LIT is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for BITI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LIT or BITI?

BITI has the higher dividend yield at 15.62%, compared with 0.73% for LIT.

What is the main difference between LIT and BITI?

LIT is categorized as Lithium & Battery Metals, while BITI is Cryptocurrency. LIT tracks Solactive Global Lithium Index, while BITI tracks Bloomberg Bitcoin Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for LIT and 1.03% for BITI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LIT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.