LINT vs. TYLD
LINT (Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares) and TYLD (Cambria Tactical Yield ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LINT is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Direxion, while TYLD is a fund fund actively managed by Cambria. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.13, they often move in opposite directions. LINT charges 0.97%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for TYLD.
Performance
LINT vs. TYLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LINT achieves a 562.84% return, which is significantly higher than TYLD's 1.50% return.
LINT
- 1D
- 9.00%
- 1M
- 30.35%
- YTD
- 562.84%
- 6M
- 362.73%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TYLD
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.40%
- YTD
- 1.50%
- 6M
- 1.92%
- 1Y
- 4.06%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LINT vs. TYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares | 562.84% | 5.79% |
TYLD Cambria Tactical Yield ETF | 1.50% | 0.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between LINT and TYLD is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2025 | -0.13 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LINT vs. TYLD — Risk / Return Rank
LINT
TYLD
LINT vs. TYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT) and Cambria Tactical Yield ETF (TYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LINT | TYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 5.42 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 24.05 | 2.53 | +21.51 |
Drawdowns
LINT vs. TYLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LINT drawdown since its inception was -49.54%, which is greater than TYLD's maximum drawdown of -1.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LINT and TYLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LINT | TYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.54% | -1.06% | -48.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.12% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.55% | 0.00% | -26.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.51% | -0.11% | -20.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.03% | — |
Volatility
LINT vs. TYLD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LINT | TYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.26% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.55% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 163.04% | 0.75% | +162.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 163.04% | 1.77% | +161.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 163.04% | 1.77% | +161.27% |
LINT vs. TYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
LINT has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than TYLD's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
LINT vs. TYLD - Dividend Comparison
LINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%, less than TYLD's 4.69% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares | 0.13% | 0.25% | 0.00% |
TYLD Cambria Tactical Yield ETF | 4.69% | 4.38% | 4.24% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LINT and TYLD have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TYLD is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TYLD is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for LINT.
TYLD has the higher dividend yield at 4.69%, compared with 0.13% for LINT.
They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Cambria. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for LINT and 0.59% for TYLD.
Find the right allocation for LINT and TYLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer