PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LINT vs. MUU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LINT vs. MUU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT) and Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


LINT

1D
-0.31%
1M
11.85%
YTD
743.89%
6M
776.05%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MUU

1D
-0.64%
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LINT vs. MUU - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between LINT and MUU is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2026

0.94

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LINT vs. MUU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT) and Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

LINT vs. MUU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LINT vs. MUU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LINT drawdown since its inception was -49.54%, which is greater than MUU's maximum drawdown of -26.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LINT and MUU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LINTMUUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.54%

-26.63%

-22.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.96%

-26.63%

+13.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.43%

-12.91%

-7.52%

Volatility

LINT vs. MUU - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LINTMUUDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

168.25%

263.57%

-95.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

168.25%

263.57%

-95.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

168.25%

263.57%

-95.32%

LINT vs. MUU - Expense Ratio Comparison

LINT has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is lower than MUU's 1.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

LINT vs. MUU - Dividend Comparison

LINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%, more than MUU's 0.23% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, LINT and MUU move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, LINT is cheaper at 0.97% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LINT is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for MUU.

LINT has the higher dividend yield at 0.32%, compared with 0.23% for MUU.

Their fees differ too: 0.97% for LINT and 1.01% for MUU.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LINT and MUU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer