PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LINT vs. MUU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LINT vs. MUU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT) and Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LINT achieves a 562.84% return, which is significantly lower than MUU's 961.23% return.


LINT

1D
9.00%
1M
30.35%
YTD
562.84%
6M
362.73%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MUU

1D
3.08%
1M
218.90%
YTD
961.23%
6M
1,422.01%
1Y
6,522.95%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LINT vs. MUU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
LINT
Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares
562.84%5.79%
MUU
Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares
961.23%50.94%

Correlation

The correlation between LINT and MUU is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2025

0.47

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LINT vs. MUU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LINT

MUU
MUU Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
MUU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MUU Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
MUU Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
MUU Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
MUU Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LINT vs. MUU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT) and Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

LINT vs. MUU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LINTMUUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

50.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

24.05

6.68

+17.36

Drawdowns

LINT vs. MUU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LINT drawdown since its inception was -49.54%, smaller than the maximum MUU drawdown of -75.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LINT and MUU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LINTMUUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.54%

-75.07%

+25.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-52.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-26.55%

0.00%

-26.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.51%

-23.44%

+2.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.51%

Volatility

LINT vs. MUU - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LINTMUUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

54.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

105.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

163.04%

131.77%

+31.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

163.04%

133.67%

+29.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

163.04%

133.67%

+29.37%

LINT vs. MUU - Expense Ratio Comparison

LINT has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is lower than MUU's 1.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

LINT vs. MUU - Dividend Comparison

LINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%, less than MUU's 0.46% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
LINT
Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares
0.13%0.25%0.00%
MUU
Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares
0.46%4.27%0.31%

Frequently Asked Questions


LINT and MUU have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LINT is cheaper at 0.97% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LINT is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 1.06% for MUU.

MUU has the higher dividend yield at 0.46%, compared with 0.13% for LINT.

Their fees differ too: 0.97% for LINT and 1.06% for MUU.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LINT and MUU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer