LINT vs. MUU
LINT (Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares) and MUU (Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Direxion. Both are actively managed. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LINT charges 0.97%/yr vs 1.06%/yr for MUU.
Performance
LINT vs. MUU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LINT achieves a 562.84% return, which is significantly lower than MUU's 961.23% return.
LINT
- 1D
- 9.00%
- 1M
- 30.35%
- YTD
- 562.84%
- 6M
- 362.73%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MUU
- 1D
- 3.08%
- 1M
- 218.90%
- YTD
- 961.23%
- 6M
- 1,422.01%
- 1Y
- 6,522.95%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LINT vs. MUU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares | 562.84% | 5.79% |
MUU Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares | 961.23% | 50.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between LINT and MUU is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2025 | 0.47 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LINT vs. MUU — Risk / Return Rank
LINT
MUU
LINT vs. MUU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT) and Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LINT | MUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 50.40 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 24.05 | 6.68 | +17.36 |
Drawdowns
LINT vs. MUU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LINT drawdown since its inception was -49.54%, smaller than the maximum MUU drawdown of -75.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LINT and MUU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LINT | MUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.54% | -75.07% | +25.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -52.72% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.55% | 0.00% | -26.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.51% | -23.44% | +2.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 15.51% | — |
Volatility
LINT vs. MUU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LINT | MUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 54.78% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 105.07% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 163.04% | 131.77% | +31.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 163.04% | 133.67% | +29.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 163.04% | 133.67% | +29.37% |
LINT vs. MUU - Expense Ratio Comparison
LINT has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is lower than MUU's 1.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
LINT vs. MUU - Dividend Comparison
LINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%, less than MUU's 0.46% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares | 0.13% | 0.25% | 0.00% |
MUU Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares | 0.46% | 4.27% | 0.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LINT and MUU have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LINT is cheaper at 0.97% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LINT is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 1.06% for MUU.
MUU has the higher dividend yield at 0.46%, compared with 0.13% for LINT.
Their fees differ too: 0.97% for LINT and 1.06% for MUU.
Find the right allocation for LINT and MUU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer