LINT vs. IFED
LINT (Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares) and IFED (ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN) are both Leveraged Equities funds. LINT is actively managed, while IFED is passively managed. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LINT charges 0.97%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for IFED.
Performance
LINT vs. IFED - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LINT achieves a 562.84% return, which is significantly higher than IFED's -3.52% return.
LINT
- 1D
- 9.00%
- 1M
- 30.35%
- YTD
- 562.84%
- 6M
- 362.73%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IFED
- 1D
- -1.24%
- 1M
- 4.85%
- YTD
- -3.52%
- 6M
- -3.51%
- 1Y
- 1.97%
- 3Y*
- 16.71%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LINT vs. IFED - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares | 562.84% | 5.79% |
IFED ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN | -3.52% | 2.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between LINT and IFED is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2025 | 0.16 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LINT vs. IFED — Risk / Return Rank
LINT
IFED
LINT vs. IFED - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT) and ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN (IFED). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LINT | IFED | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.12 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 24.05 | 0.65 | +23.40 |
Drawdowns
LINT vs. IFED - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LINT drawdown since its inception was -49.54%, which is greater than IFED's maximum drawdown of -22.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LINT and IFED.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LINT | IFED | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.54% | -22.36% | -27.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -14.65% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -22.36% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.55% | -5.50% | -21.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.51% | -5.84% | -14.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.75% | — |
Volatility
LINT vs. IFED - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LINT | IFED | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.50% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 12.86% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 163.04% | 16.21% | +146.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 163.04% | 19.88% | +143.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 163.04% | 19.88% | +143.16% |
LINT vs. IFED - Expense Ratio Comparison
LINT has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than IFED's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
LINT vs. IFED - Dividend Comparison
LINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%, while IFED has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
IFED ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares | 0.13% | 0.25% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LINT and IFED have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IFED is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IFED is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for LINT.
LINT has the higher dividend yield at 0.13%, compared with 0.00% for IFED.
They also come from different issuers: Direxion and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for LINT and 0.45% for IFED.
Find the right allocation for LINT and IFED
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer