LINT vs. AMUU

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

LINT (Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares) and AMUU (Direxion Daily AMD Bull 2X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Direxion. Both are actively managed. Their 0.70 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. Both charge a 0.97% expense ratio.

Performance

LINT vs. AMUU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT) and Direxion Daily AMD Bull 2X Shares (AMUU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LINT achieves a 347.15% return, which is significantly higher than AMUU's 306.27% return.

LINT

• 1D: 22.09%
• 1M: -34.82%
• 6M: 182.15%
• YTD: 347.15%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

AMUU

• 1D: 17.24%
• 1M: -4.37%
• 6M: 228.01%
• YTD: 306.27%
• 1Y: 388.48%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 386.67%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
AMUU Direxion Daily AMD Bull 2X Shares	$24.68M	$23.59M	$27.42M
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares	$20.13M	$20.02M	$34.55M

LINT vs. AMUU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares	347.15%	5.81%
AMUU Direxion Daily AMD Bull 2X Shares	306.27%	-16.95%

Correlation

The correlation between LINT and AMUU is 0.70, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025	0.70

LINT vs. AMUU - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	LINT	AMUU
Technology	100.0%	100.0%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

LINT vs. AMUU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LINT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

AMUU

AMUU Risk / Return Rank: 88
AMUU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
AMUU Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
AMUU Omega Ratio Rank: 82
AMUU Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
AMUU Martin Ratio Rank: 84

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LINT vs. AMUU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT) and Direxion Daily AMD Bull 2X Shares (AMUU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LINT	AMUU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.74	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	3.09	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.38	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	6.95	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	13.06	—

Drawdowns

LINT vs. AMUU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LINT drawdown since its inception was -69.02%, which is greater than AMUU's maximum drawdown of -56.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LINT and AMUU.

Drawdown Indicators

	LINT	AMUU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-69.02%	-56.47%	-12.55%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-56.31%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-53.88%	-23.82%	-30.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-24.24%	-22.32%	-1.92%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	29.93%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	LINT	AMUU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	49.37%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	112.17%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	170.36%	143.17%	+27.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	170.36%	136.32%	+34.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	170.36%	136.32%	+34.04%

LINT vs. AMUU - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both LINT and AMUU have an expense ratio of 0.97%.

Dividends

LINT vs. AMUU - Dividend Comparison

LINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%, less than AMUU's 3.70% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
AMUU Direxion Daily AMD Bull 2X Shares	3.70%	13.58%
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares	0.61%	0.25%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LINT and AMUU in my portfolio?

LINT and AMUU have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, LINT or AMUU?

Both ETFs have the same 0.97% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, LINT or AMUU?

LINT and AMUU have the same expense ratio: 0.97% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LINT or AMUU?

AMUU has the higher dividend yield at 3.70%, compared with 0.61% for LINT.