PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMUU vs. AMDL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AMUU vs. AMDL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily AMD Bull 2X Shares (AMUU) and GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with AMUU having a 390.11% return and AMDL slightly lower at 386.95%.


AMUU

1D
5.57%
1M
31.43%
YTD
390.11%
6M
385.03%
1Y
984.73%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AMDL

1D
5.43%
1M
30.82%
YTD
386.95%
6M
382.29%
1Y
978.63%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMUU vs. AMDL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
AMUU
Direxion Daily AMD Bull 2X Shares
390.11%153.20%
AMDL
GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF
386.95%148.80%

Correlation

The correlation between AMUU and AMDL is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 12, 2025

1.00

The correlation between AMUU and AMDL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

AMUU vs. AMDL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AMUU
AMDL

Technology

100.0%
66.6%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

AMUU
100.0%
AMDL
66.6%

Basic Materials

AMUU

-

AMDL

-

Communication Services

AMUU

-

AMDL

-

Consumer Cyclical

AMUU

-

AMDL

-

Consumer Defensive

AMUU

-

AMDL

-

Energy

AMUU

-

AMDL

-

Financial Services

AMUU

-

AMDL

-

Healthcare

AMUU

-

AMDL

-

Industrials

AMUU

-

AMDL

-

Real Estate

AMUU

-

AMDL

-

Utilities

AMUU

-

AMDL

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AMUU vs. AMDL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMUU
AMUU Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
AMUU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMUU Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMUU Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
AMUU Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMUU Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

AMDL
AMDL Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
AMDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMDL Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
AMDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMDL Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMUU vs. AMDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily AMD Bull 2X Shares (AMUU) and GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AMUUAMDLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

0.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.57

1.57

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

17.67

17.62

+0.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

34.34

34.27

+0.06

AMUU vs. AMDL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMUU Sharpe Ratio is 7.43, which is comparable to the AMDL Sharpe Ratio of 7.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMUU and AMDL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AMUU vs. AMDL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMUU drawdown since its inception was -56.47%, smaller than the maximum AMDL drawdown of -88.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMUU and AMDL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMUUAMDLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.47%

-88.63%

+32.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-56.31%

-56.13%

-0.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.64%

-1.66%

+1.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.50%

-47.80%

+25.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

28.92%

28.80%

+0.12%

Volatility

AMUU vs. AMDL - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily AMD Bull 2X Shares (AMUU) and GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDL) have volatilities of 46.38% and 46.96%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMUUAMDLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

46.38%

46.96%

-0.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

101.29%

101.28%

+0.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

134.26%

134.09%

+0.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

133.29%

118.34%

+14.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

133.29%

118.34%

+14.95%

AMUU vs. AMDL - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMUU has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is lower than AMDL's 1.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

AMUU vs. AMDL - Dividend Comparison

AMUU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.85%, while AMDL has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, AMUU and AMDL move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

AMDL has higher volatility (46.96%) compared to AMUU (46.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMUU dropped -56.47% vs AMDL's -88.63%.

On 1-year performance, AMUU leads with 984.73% vs 978.63% for AMDL. On fees, AMUU is cheaper at 0.97% per year. On volatility, AMUU has been the lower-risk option at 46.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AMUU has performed better with a 984.73% return vs 978.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AMUU is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for AMDL.

AMUU has the higher dividend yield at 2.85%, compared with 0.00% for AMDL.

They also come from different issuers: Direxion and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for AMUU and 1.15% for AMDL.

AMUU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.43 vs 7.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMUU and AMDL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer