LINK vs. DOT-USD
LINK (Interlink Electronics, Inc.) is a stock, while DOT-USD (Polkadot) is a cryptocurrency. Over the past 5 years, LINK returned 0.35%/yr vs -43.82%/yr for DOT-USD. At a 0.00 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LINK vs. DOT-USD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LINK achieves a 4.90% return, which is significantly higher than DOT-USD's -53.00% return.
LINK
- 1D
- 4.36%
- 1M
- -24.77%
- YTD
- 4.90%
- 6M
- 3.30%
- 1Y
- 12.64%
- 3Y*
- -5.87%
- 5Y*
- 0.35%
- 10Y*
- -2.63%
DOT-USD
- 1D
- -5.20%
- 1M
- -32.70%
- YTD
- -53.00%
- 6M
- -50.12%
- 1Y
- -74.96%
- 3Y*
- -45.19%
- 5Y*
- -43.82%
- 10Y*
- —
LINK vs. DOT-USD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LINK Interlink Electronics, Inc. | 4.90% | -6.66% | -26.76% | 56.50% | -15.75% | -9.36% |
DOT-USD Polkadot | -53.00% | -73.03% | -22.95% | 96.80% | -84.73% | 19.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between LINK and DOT-USD is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.00 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2021 | 0.00 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LINK vs. DOT-USD — Risk / Return Rank
LINK
DOT-USD
LINK vs. DOT-USD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Interlink Electronics, Inc. (LINK) and Polkadot (DOT-USD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LINK | DOT-USD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.80 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 0.83 | +0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.18 | -0.92 | +1.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.25 | -1.40 | +1.66 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LINK vs. DOT-USD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LINK drawdown since its inception was -87.37%, smaller than the maximum DOT-USD drawdown of -98.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LINK and DOT-USD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LINK | DOT-USD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -87.37% | -98.44% | +11.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -71.27% | -81.55% | +10.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -71.27% | -92.73% | +21.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -71.27% | -98.44% | +27.17% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -85.99% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -57.49% | -98.44% | +40.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.47% | -81.18% | +37.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 50.09% | 50.83% | -0.74% |
Volatility
LINK vs. DOT-USD - Volatility Comparison
Interlink Electronics, Inc. (LINK) has a higher volatility of 27.09% compared to Polkadot (DOT-USD) at 16.49%. This indicates that LINK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DOT-USD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LINK | DOT-USD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 27.09% | 16.49% | +10.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 59.60% | 57.99% | +1.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 101.37% | 71.04% | +30.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 78.63% | 71.98% | +6.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 94.59% | 72.60% | +21.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LINK and DOT-USD have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LINK has higher volatility (27.09%) compared to DOT-USD (16.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LINK dropped -87.37% vs DOT-USD's -98.44%.
LINK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.13 vs -0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LINK and DOT-USD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer