PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LINK vs. NVDA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LINK vs. NVDA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Interlink Electronics, Inc. (LINK) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LINK achieves a 28.61% return, which is significantly higher than NVDA's 15.15% return. Over the past 10 years, LINK has underperformed NVDA with an annualized return of 0.37%, while NVDA has yielded a comparatively higher 68.84% annualized return.


LINK

1D
-6.55%
1M
67.45%
YTD
28.61%
6M
37.09%
1Y
25.78%
3Y*
5.00%
5Y*
0.41%
10Y*
0.37%

NVDA

1D
-3.62%
1M
8.20%
YTD
15.15%
6M
19.59%
1Y
52.10%
3Y*
76.15%
5Y*
65.05%
10Y*
68.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LINK vs. NVDA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LINK
Interlink Electronics, Inc.
28.61%-6.66%-26.76%56.50%-15.75%7.61%89.47%126.19%-59.77%-25.61%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
15.15%38.92%171.25%239.02%-50.26%125.48%122.30%76.94%-30.82%81.99%

Correlation

The correlation between LINK and NVDA is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2012

0.06

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LINK:

$78.59M

NVDA:

$5.24T

EPS

LINK:

-$0.08

NVDA:

$6.53

PS Ratio

LINK:

5.61

NVDA:

20.72

PB Ratio

LINK:

8.99

NVDA:

26.80

Total Revenue (TTM)

LINK:

$12.30M

NVDA:

$253.49B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LINK:

$5.02M

NVDA:

$187.95B

EBITDA (TTM)

LINK:

-$711.00K

NVDA:

$192.76B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LINK vs. NVDA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LINK
LINK Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
LINK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LINK Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
LINK Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
LINK Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
LINK Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

NVDA
NVDA Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
NVDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDA Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDA Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LINK vs. NVDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Interlink Electronics, Inc. (LINK) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LINKNVDADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.96

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.26

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.36

2.59

-2.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.53

6.36

-5.83

LINK vs. NVDA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LINK Sharpe Ratio is 0.25, which is lower than the NVDA Sharpe Ratio of 1.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LINK and NVDA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LINKNVDADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

1.53

-1.29

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.01

1.27

-1.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.00

1.39

-1.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.12

0.63

-0.51

Drawdowns

LINK vs. NVDA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LINK drawdown since its inception was -87.37%, roughly equal to the maximum NVDA drawdown of -89.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LINK and NVDA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LINKNVDADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-87.37%

-89.72%

+2.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-71.27%

-20.21%

-51.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-71.27%

-36.88%

-34.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-71.27%

-66.34%

-4.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-87.37%

-66.34%

-21.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-47.88%

-8.90%

-38.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-43.34%

-36.21%

-7.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

48.43%

8.21%

+40.22%

Volatility

LINK vs. NVDA - Volatility Comparison

Interlink Electronics, Inc. (LINK) has a higher volatility of 34.02% compared to NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) at 12.53%. This indicates that LINK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NVDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LINKNVDADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

34.02%

12.53%

+21.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

60.33%

25.54%

+34.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

104.94%

34.22%

+70.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

79.06%

51.69%

+27.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

94.66%

49.80%

+44.86%

Dividends

LINK vs. NVDA - Dividend Comparison

LINK has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NVDA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LINK
Interlink Electronics, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
0.02%0.02%0.03%0.03%0.11%0.05%0.12%0.27%0.46%0.29%0.45%1.20%

Financials

LINK vs. NVDA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Interlink Electronics, Inc. and NVIDIA Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B20222023202420252026
3.07M
81.62B
(LINK) Total Revenue
(NVDA) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

LINK vs. NVDA - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Interlink Electronics, Inc. and NVIDIA Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
43.5%
74.9%
Portfolio components
LINK - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Interlink Electronics, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.34M and revenue of 3.07M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 43.5%.

NVDA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported a gross profit of 61.16B and revenue of 81.62B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.9%.

LINK - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Interlink Electronics, Inc. reported an operating income of -450.00K and revenue of 3.07M, resulting in an operating margin of -14.6%.

NVDA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported an operating income of 53.54B and revenue of 81.62B, resulting in an operating margin of 65.6%.

LINK - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Interlink Electronics, Inc. reported a net income of -338.00K and revenue of 3.07M, resulting in a net margin of -11.0%.

NVDA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported a net income of 58.32B and revenue of 81.62B, resulting in a net margin of 71.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


LINK and NVDA have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LINK has higher volatility (34.02%) compared to NVDA (12.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LINK dropped -87.37% vs NVDA's -89.72%.

NVDA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.53 vs 0.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LINK and NVDA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer