PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
DOT-USD vs. MATIC-USD
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between DOT-USD and MATIC-USD is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.7

Performance

DOT-USD vs. MATIC-USD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Polkadot (DOT-USD) and Polygon USD (MATIC-USD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-40.00%-20.00%0.00%20.00%40.00%60.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
11.15%
-6.32%
DOT-USD
MATIC-USD

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

DOT-USD:

0.10

MATIC-USD:

-0.39

Sortino Ratio

DOT-USD:

0.81

MATIC-USD:

-0.09

Omega Ratio

DOT-USD:

1.08

MATIC-USD:

0.99

Calmar Ratio

DOT-USD:

0.02

MATIC-USD:

0.01

Martin Ratio

DOT-USD:

0.26

MATIC-USD:

-0.90

Ulcer Index

DOT-USD:

32.30%

MATIC-USD:

37.15%

Daily Std Dev

DOT-USD:

69.32%

MATIC-USD:

69.61%

Max Drawdown

DOT-USD:

-93.24%

MATIC-USD:

-89.89%

Current Drawdown

DOT-USD:

-86.94%

MATIC-USD:

-82.40%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DOT-USD achieves a 6.16% return, which is significantly lower than MATIC-USD's 12.67% return.


DOT-USD

YTD

6.16%

1M

1.12%

6M

11.14%

1Y

2.45%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

MATIC-USD

YTD

12.67%

1M

-1.76%

6M

-4.84%

1Y

-35.31%

5Y*

98.57%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

DOT-USD vs. MATIC-USD — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DOT-USD
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of DOT-USD is 4242
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of DOT-USD is 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of DOT-USD is 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of DOT-USD is 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of DOT-USD is 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of DOT-USD is 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

MATIC-USD
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MATIC-USD is 1515
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MATIC-USD is 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MATIC-USD is 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MATIC-USD is 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MATIC-USD is 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MATIC-USD is 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

DOT-USD vs. MATIC-USD - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Polkadot (DOT-USD) and Polygon USD (MATIC-USD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for DOT-USD, currently valued at 0.10, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.000.10-0.40
The chart of Sortino ratio for DOT-USD, currently valued at 0.81, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.81-0.11
The chart of Omega ratio for DOT-USD, currently valued at 1.08, compared to the broader market1.001.201.401.601.080.99
The chart of Calmar ratio for DOT-USD, currently valued at 0.02, compared to the broader market2.004.006.008.000.020.01
The chart of Martin ratio for DOT-USD, currently valued at 0.26, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.000.26-0.91
DOT-USD
MATIC-USD

The current DOT-USD Sharpe Ratio is 0.10, which is higher than the MATIC-USD Sharpe Ratio of -0.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DOT-USD and MATIC-USD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.00AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
0.10
-0.40
DOT-USD
MATIC-USD

Drawdowns

DOT-USD vs. MATIC-USD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DOT-USD drawdown since its inception was -93.24%, roughly equal to the maximum MATIC-USD drawdown of -89.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DOT-USD and MATIC-USD. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-90.00%-85.00%-80.00%-75.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-86.94%
-82.40%
DOT-USD
MATIC-USD

Volatility

DOT-USD vs. MATIC-USD - Volatility Comparison

Polkadot (DOT-USD) and Polygon USD (MATIC-USD) have volatilities of 24.56% and 23.81%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%30.00%35.00%40.00%45.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
24.56%
23.81%
DOT-USD
MATIC-USD
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab