DOT-USD vs. ATOM-USD
DOT-USD (Polkadot) and ATOM-USD (Cosmos) are both cryptocurrencies. Over the past 3 years, DOT-USD returned -42.43%/yr vs -45.18%/yr for ATOM-USD. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
DOT-USD vs. ATOM-USD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DOT-USD achieves a -46.41% return, which is significantly lower than ATOM-USD's -13.19% return.
DOT-USD
- 1D
- -7.65%
- 1M
- -27.34%
- YTD
- -46.41%
- 6M
- -54.95%
- 1Y
- -74.90%
- 3Y*
- -42.43%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ATOM-USD
- 1D
- -7.52%
- 1M
- -12.09%
- YTD
- -13.19%
- 6M
- -23.97%
- 1Y
- -59.05%
- 3Y*
- -45.18%
- 5Y*
- -35.63%
- 10Y*
- —
DOT-USD vs. ATOM-USD - Yearly Performance Comparison
Correlation
The correlation between DOT-USD and ATOM-USD is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2021 | 0.23 |
Over the past year, DOT-USD and ATOM-USD have become more correlated (0.80) than their long-term average of 0.23, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DOT-USD vs. ATOM-USD — Risk / Return Rank
DOT-USD
ATOM-USD
DOT-USD vs. ATOM-USD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Polkadot (DOT-USD) and Cosmos (ATOM-USD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DOT-USD | ATOM-USD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.83 | 0.87 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.95 | -0.86 | -0.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.49 | -1.24 | -0.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DOT-USD | ATOM-USD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.87 | -0.87 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.38 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.54 | -0.16 | -0.38 |
Drawdowns
DOT-USD vs. ATOM-USD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DOT-USD drawdown since its inception was -98.22%, roughly equal to the maximum ATOM-USD drawdown of -96.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DOT-USD and ATOM-USD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DOT-USD | ATOM-USD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.22% | -96.29% | -1.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -78.97% | -68.29% | -10.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -91.72% | -88.44% | -3.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -96.29% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -98.22% | -96.23% | -1.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -80.94% | -64.99% | -15.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 58.60% | 48.48% | +10.12% |
Volatility
DOT-USD vs. ATOM-USD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Polkadot (DOT-USD) is 16.71%, while Cosmos (ATOM-USD) has a volatility of 18.10%. This indicates that DOT-USD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ATOM-USD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DOT-USD | ATOM-USD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.71% | 18.10% | -1.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 58.60% | 42.48% | +16.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 71.61% | 56.43% | +15.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 72.88% | 78.12% | -5.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 72.88% | 90.73% | -17.85% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DOT-USD and ATOM-USD have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ATOM-USD has higher volatility (18.10%) compared to DOT-USD (16.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DOT-USD dropped -98.22% vs ATOM-USD's -96.29%.
DOT-USD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.87 vs -0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DOT-USD and ATOM-USD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer