LINE vs. FLCH
LINE (Lineage, Inc.) is a stock, while FLCH (Franklin FTSE China ETF) is China Equities fund tracking the FTSE China RIC Capped Index. Over the past year, LINE returned 10.55% vs -3.28% for FLCH. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LINE vs. FLCH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LINE achieves a 27.09% return, which is significantly higher than FLCH's -9.29% return.
LINE
- 1D
- -3.07%
- 1M
- 5.69%
- 6M
- 22.40%
- YTD
- 27.09%
- 1Y
- 10.55%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -24.13%
FLCH
- 1D
- 1.99%
- 1M
- 1.65%
- 6M
- -12.52%
- YTD
- -9.29%
- 1Y
- -3.28%
- 3Y*
- 9.28%
- 5Y*
- -4.30%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 0.20%
LINE vs. FLCH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
LINE Lineage, Inc. | 27.09% | -37.20% | -27.57% |
FLCH Franklin FTSE China ETF | -9.29% | 32.55% | 15.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between LINE and FLCH is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2024 | 0.25 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LINE vs. FLCH — Risk / Return Rank
LINE
FLCH
LINE vs. FLCH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lineage, Inc. (LINE) and Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LINE | FLCH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 0.99 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.40 | -0.15 | +0.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.79 | -0.34 | +1.12 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LINE vs. FLCH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LINE drawdown since its inception was -61.74%, roughly equal to the maximum FLCH drawdown of -62.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LINE and FLCH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LINE | FLCH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.74% | -62.09% | +0.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.78% | -21.48% | -5.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -25.43% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -52.45% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -46.49% | -36.06% | -10.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -41.27% | -30.61% | -10.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.46% | 9.77% | +3.69% |
Volatility
LINE vs. FLCH - Volatility Comparison
Lineage, Inc. (LINE) has a higher volatility of 8.81% compared to Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH) at 6.16%. This indicates that LINE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLCH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LINE | FLCH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.81% | 6.16% | +2.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.45% | 14.05% | +14.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.14% | 19.88% | +18.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.49% | 29.62% | +6.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.49% | 27.82% | +8.67% |
Dividends
LINE vs. FLCH - Dividend Comparison
LINE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.91%, more than FLCH's 2.39% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLCH Franklin FTSE China ETF | 2.39% | 2.36% | 2.87% | 3.47% | 2.69% | 1.48% | 0.91% | 1.98% | 1.92% | 0.01% |
LINE Lineage, Inc. | 4.91% | 6.03% | 1.55% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LINE and FLCH have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LINE has higher volatility (8.81%) compared to FLCH (6.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LINE dropped -61.74% vs FLCH's -62.09%.
LINE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.28 vs -0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LINE and FLCH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer