LINE vs. FLCH
LINE (Lineage, Inc.) is a stock, while FLCH (Franklin FTSE China ETF) is China Equities fund tracking the FTSE China RIC Capped Index. Over the past year, LINE returned 0.00% vs 2.19% for FLCH. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LINE vs. FLCH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LINE achieves a 22.88% return, which is significantly higher than FLCH's -9.50% return.
LINE
- 1D
- -0.80%
- 1M
- 5.83%
- YTD
- 22.88%
- 6M
- 25.85%
- 1Y
- 0.00%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FLCH
- 1D
- -0.60%
- 1M
- -8.03%
- YTD
- -9.50%
- 6M
- -11.21%
- 1Y
- 2.19%
- 3Y*
- 8.94%
- 5Y*
- -5.25%
- 10Y*
- —
LINE vs. FLCH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
LINE Lineage, Inc. | 22.88% | -37.20% | -26.48% |
FLCH Franklin FTSE China ETF | -9.50% | 32.55% | 16.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between LINE and FLCH is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2024 | 0.28 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LINE vs. FLCH — Risk / Return Rank
LINE
FLCH
LINE vs. FLCH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lineage, Inc. (LINE) and Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LINE | FLCH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.04 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.00 | 0.13 | -0.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.00 | 0.29 | -0.29 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LINE | FLCH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.00 | 0.11 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.18 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.72 | 0.00 | -0.72 |
Drawdowns
LINE vs. FLCH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LINE drawdown since its inception was -61.74%, roughly equal to the maximum FLCH drawdown of -62.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LINE and FLCH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LINE | FLCH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.74% | -62.09% | +0.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.46% | -17.14% | -11.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -25.43% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -55.78% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -48.26% | -36.20% | -12.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -41.04% | -30.54% | -10.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.15% | 7.58% | +7.57% |
Volatility
LINE vs. FLCH - Volatility Comparison
Lineage, Inc. (LINE) has a higher volatility of 10.08% compared to Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH) at 6.46%. This indicates that LINE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLCH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LINE | FLCH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.08% | 6.46% | +3.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.96% | 13.88% | +15.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.61% | 19.31% | +18.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.70% | 29.61% | +7.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.70% | 27.91% | +8.79% |
Dividends
LINE vs. FLCH - Dividend Comparison
LINE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.00%, more than FLCH's 2.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLCH Franklin FTSE China ETF | 2.61% | 2.36% | 2.87% | 3.47% | 2.69% | 1.48% | 0.91% | 1.98% | 1.92% | 0.01% |
LINE Lineage, Inc. | 5.00% | 6.03% | 1.55% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LINE and FLCH have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LINE has higher volatility (10.08%) compared to FLCH (6.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LINE dropped -61.74% vs FLCH's -62.09%.
FLCH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.11 vs 0.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LINE and FLCH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer