PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LIMIX vs. RYGRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LIMIX vs. RYGRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tran Capital Focused Fund (LIMIX) and Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund (RYGRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LIMIX achieves a 15.59% return, which is significantly lower than RYGRX's 29.11% return. Over the past 10 years, LIMIX has underperformed RYGRX with an annualized return of 12.32%, while RYGRX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.54% annualized return.


LIMIX

1D
0.00%
1M
7.63%
YTD
15.59%
6M
14.06%
1Y
20.70%
3Y*
17.91%
5Y*
5.07%
10Y*
12.32%

RYGRX

1D
-4.53%
1M
5.34%
YTD
29.11%
6M
26.03%
1Y
33.45%
3Y*
25.09%
5Y*
9.38%
10Y*
13.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LIMIX vs. RYGRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LIMIX
Tran Capital Focused Fund
15.59%7.51%15.44%26.03%-35.23%25.39%29.59%41.84%-10.15%21.10%
RYGRX
Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund
29.11%11.00%25.73%5.80%-28.71%26.61%26.34%34.13%-6.28%23.74%

Correlation

The correlation between LIMIX and RYGRX is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 7, 2007

0.88

The correlation between LIMIX and RYGRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LIMIX vs. RYGRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LIMIX
LIMIX Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
LIMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LIMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
LIMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
LIMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
LIMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

RYGRX
RYGRX Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
RYGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
RYGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LIMIX vs. RYGRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tran Capital Focused Fund (LIMIX) and Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund (RYGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LIMIXRYGRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.29

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.80

3.22

-1.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.53

11.92

-6.40

LIMIX vs. RYGRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LIMIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.17, which is comparable to the RYGRX Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LIMIX and RYGRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LIMIX vs. RYGRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LIMIX drawdown since its inception was -48.54%, smaller than the maximum RYGRX drawdown of -54.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LIMIX and RYGRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LIMIXRYGRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.54%

-54.22%

+5.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.15%

-11.17%

-0.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.56%

-24.95%

+0.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.06%

-36.57%

-2.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.06%

-36.63%

-2.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-4.53%

+4.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.01%

-9.39%

-0.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.91%

3.01%

+0.90%

Volatility

LIMIX vs. RYGRX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Tran Capital Focused Fund (LIMIX) is 7.91%, while Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund (RYGRX) has a volatility of 11.06%. This indicates that LIMIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RYGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LIMIXRYGRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.91%

11.06%

-3.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.37%

19.00%

-3.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.76%

22.05%

-3.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.14%

23.92%

-1.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.30%

23.07%

-1.77%

LIMIX vs. RYGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LIMIX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than RYGRX's 2.26% expense ratio.


Dividends

LIMIX vs. RYGRX - Dividend Comparison

LIMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.67%, more than RYGRX's 3.94% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LIMIX
Tran Capital Focused Fund
10.67%12.33%0.12%0.00%11.31%20.68%13.21%15.96%25.90%26.44%26.77%26.69%
RYGRX
Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund
3.94%5.09%0.00%0.00%0.00%2.81%4.43%12.10%7.15%6.26%0.05%2.96%

Frequently Asked Questions


LIMIX and RYGRX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RYGRX has higher volatility (11.06%) compared to LIMIX (7.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LIMIX dropped -48.54% vs RYGRX's -54.22%.

RYGRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs 1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LIMIX and RYGRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer