LIMIX vs. FCGSX

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Tran Capital Focused Fund (LIMIX) and Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund (FCGSX).

LIMIX is managed by Lateef. It was launched on Sep 6, 2007. FCGSX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Nov 7, 2013.

Performance

LIMIX vs. FCGSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tran Capital Focused Fund (LIMIX) and Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund (FCGSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

LIMIX vs. FCGSX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LIMIX Tran Capital Focused Fund	-3.63%	7.51%	15.44%	26.03%	-35.23%	25.39%	29.59%	41.84%	-10.15%	21.10%
FCGSX Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund	-2.49%	25.52%	38.00%	45.97%	-32.15%	25.13%	70.01%	39.75%	-4.03%	37.69%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LIMIX achieves a -3.63% return, which is significantly lower than FCGSX's -2.49% return. Over the past 10 years, LIMIX has underperformed FCGSX with an annualized return of 9.54%, while FCGSX has yielded a comparatively higher 21.96% annualized return.

LIMIX

• 1D: 3.76%
• 1M: -6.88%
• YTD: -3.63%
• 6M: -6.94%
• 1Y: 12.45%
• 3Y*: 12.86%
• 5Y*: 2.68%
• 10Y*: 9.54%

FCGSX

• 1D: 4.44%
• 1M: -4.59%
• YTD: -2.49%
• 6M: 1.86%
• 1Y: 38.78%
• 3Y*: 28.90%
• 5Y*: 14.89%
• 10Y*: 21.96%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LIMIX vs. FCGSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LIMIX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than FCGSX's 0.00% expense ratio.

LIMIX

Tran Capital Focused Fund

FCGSX

Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund

Return for Risk

LIMIX vs. FCGSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LIMIX

LIMIX Risk / Return Rank: 16
LIMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
LIMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
LIMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 17
LIMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
LIMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 14

FCGSX

FCGSX Risk / Return Rank: 88
FCGSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
FCGSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
FCGSX Omega Ratio Rank: 82
FCGSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
FCGSX Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LIMIX vs. FCGSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tran Capital Focused Fund (LIMIX) and Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund (FCGSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LIMIX	FCGSX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.59	1.66	-1.07
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.00	2.34	-1.34
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.13	1.33	-0.20
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.58	2.98	-2.41
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.95	13.43	-11.47
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LIMIX vs. FCGSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LIMIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.59, which is lower than the FCGSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LIMIX and FCGSX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LIMIX	FCGSX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.59	1.66	-1.07
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.12	0.63	-0.51
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.46	0.95	-0.49
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.39	0.88	-0.50

Correlation

The correlation between LIMIX and FCGSX is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

LIMIX vs. FCGSX - Dividend Comparison

LIMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.80%, more than FCGSX's 10.74% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LIMIX Tran Capital Focused Fund	12.80%	12.33%	0.12%	0.00%	11.31%	20.68%	13.21%	15.96%	25.90%	26.44%	26.77%	26.69%
FCGSX Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund	10.74%	10.48%	12.49%	3.13%	0.61%	38.65%	31.99%	11.06%	13.21%	10.51%	2.44%	0.25%

Drawdowns

LIMIX vs. FCGSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LIMIX drawdown since its inception was -48.54%, which is greater than FCGSX's maximum drawdown of -38.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LIMIX and FCGSX.

Drawdown Indicators

	LIMIX	FCGSX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-48.54%	-38.77%	-9.77%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.69%	-13.10%	+0.41%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-39.06%	-38.77%	-0.29%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.06%	-38.77%	-0.29%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.84%	-6.44%	-2.40%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.10%	-7.05%	-3.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.58%	2.91%	+1.67%

Volatility

LIMIX vs. FCGSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Tran Capital Focused Fund (LIMIX) is 7.70%, while Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund (FCGSX) has a volatility of 8.15%. This indicates that LIMIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCGSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LIMIX	FCGSX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.70%	8.15%	-0.45%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.35%	14.39%	-1.04%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.59%	24.14%	-0.55%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.80%	23.69%	-1.89%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.11%	23.19%	-2.08%