LII vs. MSFT
LII (Lennox International Inc.) and MSFT (Microsoft Corporation) are both stocks. LII operates in Specialty Industrial Machinery (Industrials), while MSFT operates in Software - Infrastructure (Technology). Over the past 10 years, LII returned 15.59%/yr vs 24.39%/yr for MSFT. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LII vs. MSFT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LII achieves a 5.78% return, which is significantly higher than MSFT's -18.85% return. Over the past 10 years, LII has underperformed MSFT with an annualized return of 15.59%, while MSFT has yielded a comparatively higher 24.39% annualized return.
LII
- 1D
- -0.94%
- 1M
- 2.43%
- YTD
- 5.78%
- 6M
- 1.83%
- 1Y
- -3.83%
- 3Y*
- 19.41%
- 5Y*
- 9.92%
- 10Y*
- 15.59%
MSFT
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- -7.19%
- YTD
- -18.85%
- 6M
- -17.98%
- 1Y
- -17.07%
- 3Y*
- 6.16%
- 5Y*
- 9.56%
- 10Y*
- 24.39%
LII vs. MSFT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LII Lennox International Inc. | 5.78% | -19.54% | 37.27% | 89.55% | -24.94% | 19.71% | 13.79% | 12.78% | 6.33% | 37.43% |
MSFT Microsoft Corporation | -18.85% | 15.58% | 12.93% | 58.19% | -28.02% | 52.48% | 42.53% | 57.56% | 20.80% | 40.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between LII and MSFT is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 29, 1999 | 0.33 |
The correlation between LII and MSFT shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.33 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
LII:
$17.93B
MSFT:
$2.91T
LII:
$22.20
MSFT:
$16.79
LII:
23.07
MSFT:
23.27
LII:
1.40
MSFT:
1.63
LII:
3.44
MSFT:
9.16
LII:
14.77
MSFT:
7.02
LII:
$5.26B
MSFT:
$318.27B
LII:
$1.74B
MSFT:
$217.41B
LII:
$1.10B
MSFT:
$200.96B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LII vs. MSFT — Risk / Return Rank
LII
MSFT
LII vs. MSFT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lennox International Inc. (LII) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LII | MSFT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.85 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 0.89 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.18 | -0.53 | +0.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.29 | -1.08 | +0.79 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LII vs. MSFT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LII drawdown since its inception was -62.76%, smaller than the maximum MSFT drawdown of -69.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LII and MSFT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LII | MSFT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.76% | -69.38% | +6.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.77% | -33.91% | +0.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.71% | -33.91% | -0.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.88% | -37.15% | -9.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.88% | -37.15% | -9.73% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.42% | -27.46% | +4.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.51% | -21.78% | +7.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 20.90% | 16.48% | +4.42% |
Volatility
LII vs. MSFT - Volatility Comparison
Lennox International Inc. (LII) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) have volatilities of 10.80% and 10.52%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LII | MSFT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.80% | 10.52% | +0.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.49% | 22.31% | +4.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.30% | 25.42% | +9.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.15% | 26.66% | +5.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.31% | 27.06% | +2.25% |
Dividends
LII vs. MSFT - Dividend Comparison
LII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, more than MSFT's 0.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LII Lennox International Inc. | 1.02% | 1.04% | 0.75% | 0.97% | 1.71% | 1.09% | 1.12% | 1.21% | 1.11% | 0.94% | 1.08% | 1.10% |
MSFT Microsoft Corporation | 0.91% | 0.70% | 0.73% | 0.74% | 1.06% | 0.68% | 0.94% | 1.20% | 1.69% | 1.86% | 2.37% | 2.33% |
Financials
LII vs. MSFT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lennox International Inc. and Microsoft Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LII vs. MSFT - Profitability Comparison
LII - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lennox International Inc. reported a gross profit of 351.30M and revenue of 1.14B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 31.0%.
MSFT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Microsoft Corporation reported a gross profit of 56.06B and revenue of 82.89B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 67.6%.
LII - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lennox International Inc. reported an operating income of 163.50M and revenue of 1.14B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.4%.
MSFT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Microsoft Corporation reported an operating income of 38.40B and revenue of 82.89B, resulting in an operating margin of 46.3%.
LII - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lennox International Inc. reported a net income of 117.20M and revenue of 1.14B, resulting in a net margin of 10.3%.
MSFT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Microsoft Corporation reported a net income of 31.78B and revenue of 82.89B, resulting in a net margin of 38.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
LII and MSFT have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LII has higher volatility (10.80%) compared to MSFT (10.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LII dropped -62.76% vs MSFT's -69.38%.
LII currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.17 vs -0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LII and MSFT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer