PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LII vs. AXON
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LII vs. AXON - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lennox International Inc. (LII) and Axon Enterprise, Inc. (AXON). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LII achieves a 5.78% return, which is significantly higher than AXON's -22.22% return. Over the past 10 years, LII has underperformed AXON with an annualized return of 15.59%, while AXON has yielded a comparatively higher 34.58% annualized return.


LII

1D
-0.94%
1M
2.43%
YTD
5.78%
6M
1.83%
1Y
-3.83%
3Y*
19.41%
5Y*
9.92%
10Y*
15.59%

AXON

1D
-1.00%
1M
12.72%
YTD
-22.22%
6M
-21.72%
1Y
-43.41%
3Y*
30.96%
5Y*
22.92%
10Y*
34.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LII vs. AXON - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LII
Lennox International Inc.
5.78%-19.54%37.27%89.55%-24.94%19.71%13.79%12.78%6.33%37.43%
AXON
Axon Enterprise, Inc.
-22.22%-4.44%130.06%55.69%5.69%28.13%67.21%67.50%65.09%9.32%

Correlation

The correlation between LII and AXON is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 7, 2001

0.30

The correlation between LII and AXON shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (1 year) to 0.37 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LII:

$17.93B

AXON:

$36.43B

EPS

LII:

$22.20

AXON:

$2.41

PE Ratio

LII:

23.07

AXON:

183.64

PEG Ratio

LII:

1.40

AXON:

0.05

PS Ratio

LII:

3.44

AXON:

12.70

PB Ratio

LII:

14.77

AXON:

10.31

Total Revenue (TTM)

LII:

$5.26B

AXON:

$2.98B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LII:

$1.74B

AXON:

$1.77B

EBITDA (TTM)

LII:

$1.10B

AXON:

$156.24M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LII vs. AXON — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LII
LII Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
LII Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LII Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
LII Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
LII Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
LII Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

AXON
AXON Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
AXON Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AXON Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
AXON Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
AXON Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
AXON Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LII vs. AXON - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lennox International Inc. (LII) and Axon Enterprise, Inc. (AXON). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LIIAXONDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

0.87

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.18

-0.72

+0.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.29

-1.22

+0.93

LII vs. AXON - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LII Sharpe Ratio is -0.17, which is higher than the AXON Sharpe Ratio of -0.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LII and AXON, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LII vs. AXON - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LII drawdown since its inception was -62.76%, smaller than the maximum AXON drawdown of -91.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LII and AXON.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LIIAXONDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.76%

-91.78%

+29.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-33.77%

-60.28%

+26.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.71%

-60.28%

+25.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.88%

-60.28%

+13.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.88%

-60.28%

+13.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-23.42%

-49.28%

+25.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.51%

-43.60%

+29.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

20.90%

35.34%

-14.44%

Volatility

LII vs. AXON - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lennox International Inc. (LII) is 10.80%, while Axon Enterprise, Inc. (AXON) has a volatility of 17.73%. This indicates that LII experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AXON based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LIIAXONDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.80%

17.73%

-6.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.49%

44.20%

-17.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.30%

55.66%

-20.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.15%

47.94%

-15.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.31%

49.18%

-19.87%

Dividends

LII vs. AXON - Dividend Comparison

LII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, while AXON has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AXON
Axon Enterprise, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LII
Lennox International Inc.
1.02%1.04%0.75%0.97%1.71%1.09%1.12%1.21%1.11%0.94%1.08%1.10%

Financials

LII vs. AXON - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lennox International Inc. and Axon Enterprise, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B20222023202420252026
1.14B
807.35M
(LII) Total Revenue
(AXON) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

LII vs. AXON - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Lennox International Inc. and Axon Enterprise, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%20222023202420252026
31.0%
59.1%
Portfolio components
LII - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lennox International Inc. reported a gross profit of 351.30M and revenue of 1.14B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 31.0%.

AXON - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Axon Enterprise, Inc. reported a gross profit of 477.29M and revenue of 807.35M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 59.1%.

LII - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lennox International Inc. reported an operating income of 163.50M and revenue of 1.14B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.4%.

AXON - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Axon Enterprise, Inc. reported an operating income of 29.24M and revenue of 807.35M, resulting in an operating margin of 3.6%.

LII - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lennox International Inc. reported a net income of 117.20M and revenue of 1.14B, resulting in a net margin of 10.3%.

AXON - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Axon Enterprise, Inc. reported a net income of 169.31M and revenue of 807.35M, resulting in a net margin of 21.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


LII and AXON have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AXON has higher volatility (17.73%) compared to LII (10.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LII dropped -62.76% vs AXON's -91.78%.

LII currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.17 vs -0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LII and AXON

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer