LIFT vs. VGSH
LIFT (LifeX 2028 Income Bucket ETF) and VGSH (Vanguard Short-Term Treasury ETF) are both Government Bonds funds. LIFT is actively managed, while VGSH is passively managed. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LIFT charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VGSH.
Performance
LIFT vs. VGSH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LIFT achieves a 0.79% return, which is significantly higher than VGSH's 0.60% return.
LIFT
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 0.03%
- YTD
- 0.79%
- 6M
- 0.88%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VGSH
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 0.25%
- YTD
- 0.60%
- 6M
- 0.72%
- 1Y
- 3.03%
- 3Y*
- 4.25%
- 5Y*
- 1.88%
- 10Y*
- 1.71%
LIFT vs. VGSH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
LIFT LifeX 2028 Income Bucket ETF | 0.79% | 1.16% |
VGSH Vanguard Short-Term Treasury ETF | 0.60% | 1.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between LIFT and VGSH is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2025 | 0.65 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LIFT vs. VGSH — Risk / Return Rank
LIFT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
VGSH
LIFT vs. VGSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LifeX 2028 Income Bucket ETF (LIFT) and Vanguard Short-Term Treasury ETF (VGSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LIFT | VGSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.48 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.44 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 13.16 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LIFT vs. VGSH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LIFT drawdown since its inception was -0.49%, smaller than the maximum VGSH drawdown of -5.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LIFT and VGSH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LIFT | VGSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.49% | -5.70% | +5.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.88% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -0.97% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -5.66% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -5.70% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.04% | -0.17% | +0.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.09% | -0.60% | +0.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.23% | — |
Volatility
LIFT vs. VGSH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LIFT | VGSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.47% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.96% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.27% | 1.32% | -0.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.27% | 1.98% | -0.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.27% | 1.58% | -0.31% |
LIFT vs. VGSH - Expense Ratio Comparison
LIFT has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than VGSH's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
LIFT vs. VGSH - Dividend Comparison
LIFT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 31.03%, more than VGSH's 3.87% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LIFT LifeX 2028 Income Bucket ETF | 31.03% | 8.63% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VGSH Vanguard Short-Term Treasury ETF | 3.87% | 4.00% | 4.18% | 3.31% | 1.15% | 0.66% | 1.74% | 2.28% | 1.79% | 1.10% | 0.84% | 0.69% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LIFT and VGSH have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VGSH is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VGSH is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for LIFT.
LIFT has the higher dividend yield at 31.03%, compared with 3.87% for VGSH.
They also come from different issuers: Stone Ridge and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for LIFT and 0.03% for VGSH.
Find the right allocation for LIFT and VGSH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer