PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LIFT vs. LFAW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LIFT vs. LFAW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in LifeX 2028 Income Bucket ETF (LIFT) and LifeX 2060 Longevity Income ETF (LFAW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LIFT achieves a 0.72% return, which is significantly higher than LFAW's -0.24% return.


LIFT

1D
0.00%
1M
0.16%
YTD
0.72%
6M
0.96%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

LFAW

1D
0.18%
1M
0.33%
YTD
-0.24%
6M
-0.95%
1Y
3.92%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LIFT vs. LFAW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
LIFT
LifeX 2028 Income Bucket ETF
0.72%1.16%
LFAW
LifeX 2060 Longevity Income ETF
-0.24%0.07%

Correlation

The correlation between LIFT and LFAW is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2025

0.50

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LIFT vs. LFAW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LIFT

LFAW
LFAW Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
LFAW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LFAW Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
LFAW Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
LFAW Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
LFAW Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LIFT vs. LFAW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LifeX 2028 Income Bucket ETF (LIFT) and LifeX 2060 Longevity Income ETF (LFAW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

LIFT vs. LFAW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LIFTLFAWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.23

-0.28

+2.51

Drawdowns

LIFT vs. LFAW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LIFT drawdown since its inception was -0.49%, smaller than the maximum LFAW drawdown of -11.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LIFT and LFAW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LIFTLFAWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.49%

-11.37%

+10.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.05%

-4.21%

+4.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.09%

-5.44%

+5.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.36%

Volatility

LIFT vs. LFAW - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LIFTLFAWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.24%

7.65%

-6.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.24%

8.98%

-7.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.24%

8.98%

-7.74%

LIFT vs. LFAW - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both LIFT and LFAW have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

LIFT vs. LFAW - Dividend Comparison

LIFT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 31.05%, more than LFAW's 6.45% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
LFAW
LifeX 2060 Longevity Income ETF
6.45%9.85%1.47%
LIFT
LifeX 2028 Income Bucket ETF
31.05%8.63%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


LIFT and LFAW have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LIFT and LFAW have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.

LIFT has the higher dividend yield at 31.05%, compared with 6.45% for LFAW.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LIFT and LFAW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer