PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BCKT vs. LIAU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BCKT vs. LIAU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in LifeX 2030 Income Bucket ETF (BCKT) and LifeX 2060 Inflation-Protected Longevity Income ETF (LIAU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BCKT achieves a 0.52% return, which is significantly higher than LIAU's -2.43% return.


BCKT

1D
-0.07%
1M
-0.07%
6M
0.37%
YTD
0.52%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

LIAU

1D
-0.48%
1M
-2.85%
6M
-2.52%
YTD
-2.43%
1Y
-1.44%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-4.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$10.12K$7.01K$9.67K
$7.03K$4.71K$28.28K

BCKT vs. LIAU - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BCKT and LIAU is 0.66, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2025

0.66

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BCKT vs. LIAU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BCKT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


LIAU
LIAU Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
LIAU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LIAU Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
LIAU Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
LIAU Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
LIAU Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BCKT vs. LIAU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LifeX 2030 Income Bucket ETF (BCKT) and LifeX 2060 Inflation-Protected Longevity Income ETF (LIAU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BCKTLIAUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.25

BCKT vs. LIAU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BCKT vs. LIAU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCKT drawdown since its inception was -1.00%, smaller than the maximum LIAU drawdown of -9.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCKT and LIAU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BCKTLIAUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.00%

-9.95%

+8.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.38%

-7.36%

+6.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.29%

-5.23%

+4.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.81%

Volatility

BCKT vs. LIAU - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BCKTLIAUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.54%

7.06%

-5.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.54%

8.55%

-7.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.54%

8.55%

-7.01%

BCKT vs. LIAU - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BCKT and LIAU have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BCKT vs. LIAU - Dividend Comparison

BCKT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.32%, more than LIAU's 9.64% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
BCKT
LifeX 2030 Income Bucket ETF
20.32%5.36%0.00%
LIAU
LifeX 2060 Inflation-Protected Longevity Income ETF
9.64%12.93%1.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


BCKT and LIAU have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BCKT and LIAU have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.

BCKT has the higher dividend yield at 20.32%, compared with 9.64% for LIAU.

BCKT is categorized as Government Bonds, while LIAU is Inflation-Protected Bonds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BCKT and LIAU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer