PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LAVLX vs. LISDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LAVLX vs. LISDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lord Abbett Mid Cap Stock Fund (LAVLX) and Lord Abbett Short Duration Tax Free Fund (LISDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LAVLX achieves a 13.54% return, which is significantly higher than LISDX's 0.90% return. Over the past 10 years, LAVLX has outperformed LISDX with an annualized return of 9.27%, while LISDX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.58% annualized return.


LAVLX

1D
0.89%
1M
2.76%
YTD
13.54%
6M
12.08%
1Y
25.14%
3Y*
16.38%
5Y*
9.43%
10Y*
9.27%

LISDX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.71%
YTD
0.90%
6M
1.22%
1Y
3.58%
3Y*
3.55%
5Y*
1.38%
10Y*
1.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LAVLX vs. LISDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LAVLX
Lord Abbett Mid Cap Stock Fund
13.54%7.28%14.96%15.50%-11.02%28.79%2.73%22.92%-14.55%7.06%
LISDX
Lord Abbett Short Duration Tax Free Fund
0.90%4.44%3.11%3.14%-4.38%0.55%2.18%4.43%1.30%1.91%

Correlation

The correlation between LAVLX and LISDX is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2008

-0.05

The correlation between LAVLX and LISDX shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (all time) to 0.22 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LAVLX vs. LISDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LAVLX
LAVLX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
LAVLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LAVLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
LAVLX Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
LAVLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
LAVLX Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

LISDX
LISDX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
LISDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LISDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
LISDX Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
LISDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
LISDX Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LAVLX vs. LISDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Mid Cap Stock Fund (LAVLX) and Lord Abbett Short Duration Tax Free Fund (LISDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LAVLXLISDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.84

-0.46

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.45

2.50

+0.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.68

8.05

+4.63

LAVLX vs. LISDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LAVLX Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is comparable to the LISDX Sharpe Ratio of 2.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LAVLX and LISDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LAVLX vs. LISDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LAVLX drawdown since its inception was -60.58%, which is greater than LISDX's maximum drawdown of -6.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LAVLX and LISDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LAVLXLISDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.58%

-6.72%

-53.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.72%

-1.44%

-6.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.91%

-1.72%

-19.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.76%

-6.72%

-15.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.16%

-6.72%

-35.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.37%

+0.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.11%

-0.81%

-7.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.09%

0.45%

+1.64%

Volatility

LAVLX vs. LISDX - Volatility Comparison

Lord Abbett Mid Cap Stock Fund (LAVLX) has a higher volatility of 4.45% compared to Lord Abbett Short Duration Tax Free Fund (LISDX) at 0.39%. This indicates that LAVLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LISDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LAVLXLISDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.45%

0.39%

+4.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.46%

1.07%

+8.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.71%

1.38%

+11.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.30%

1.64%

+15.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.59%

1.76%

+17.83%

LAVLX vs. LISDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LAVLX has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than LISDX's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

LAVLX vs. LISDX - Dividend Comparison

LAVLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.20%, more than LISDX's 2.99% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LAVLX
Lord Abbett Mid Cap Stock Fund
6.20%7.04%9.70%1.23%8.40%8.51%1.19%3.19%6.55%2.67%0.60%0.79%
LISDX
Lord Abbett Short Duration Tax Free Fund
2.99%3.53%3.06%2.34%1.12%1.05%1.58%2.15%1.74%1.31%1.29%1.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


LAVLX and LISDX have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LAVLX has higher volatility (4.45%) compared to LISDX (0.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LAVLX dropped -60.58% vs LISDX's -6.72%.

LISDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 2.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LAVLX and LISDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer