LIBD vs. VTP
LIBD (LifeX 2065 Inflation-Protected Longevity Income ETF) and VTP (Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF) are both Inflation-Protected Bonds funds. LIBD is actively managed, while VTP is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. LIBD charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for VTP.
Performance
LIBD vs. VTP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LIBD achieves a 0.48% return, which is significantly lower than VTP's 1.55% return.
LIBD
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- 0.93%
- YTD
- 0.48%
- 6M
- -1.01%
- 1Y
- 3.91%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VTP
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- -0.08%
- YTD
- 1.55%
- 6M
- 1.09%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LIBD vs. VTP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
LIBD LifeX 2065 Inflation-Protected Longevity Income ETF | 0.48% | 1.34% |
VTP Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF | 1.55% | 2.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between LIBD and VTP is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2025 | 0.85 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LIBD vs. VTP — Risk / Return Rank
LIBD
VTP
LIBD vs. VTP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LifeX 2065 Inflation-Protected Longevity Income ETF (LIBD) and Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF (VTP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LIBD | VTP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.63 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.36 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LIBD | VTP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.29 | 1.31 | -1.03 |
Drawdowns
LIBD vs. VTP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LIBD drawdown since its inception was -7.31%, which is greater than VTP's maximum drawdown of -1.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LIBD and VTP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LIBD | VTP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.31% | -1.92% | -5.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.19% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.69% | -0.30% | -3.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.20% | -0.52% | -2.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.89% | — | — |
Volatility
LIBD vs. VTP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LIBD | VTP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.14% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.64% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.08% | 3.26% | +4.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.64% | 3.26% | +6.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.64% | 3.26% | +6.38% |
LIBD vs. VTP - Expense Ratio Comparison
LIBD has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than VTP's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
LIBD vs. VTP - Dividend Comparison
LIBD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.50%, more than VTP's 1.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
LIBD LifeX 2065 Inflation-Protected Longevity Income ETF | 11.50% | 13.52% |
VTP Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF | 1.61% | 1.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LIBD and VTP have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VTP is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VTP is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for LIBD.
LIBD has the higher dividend yield at 11.50%, compared with 1.61% for VTP.
They also come from different issuers: Stone Ridge and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for LIBD and 0.05% for VTP.
Find the right allocation for LIBD and VTP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer