LIBD vs. BBBL
LIBD (LifeX 2065 Inflation-Protected Longevity Income ETF) and BBBL (Bondbloxx BBB Rated 10+ Year Corporate Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LIBD is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund actively managed by Stone Ridge, while BBBL is a Long-Term Bond fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Corporate BBB 10+ Year Index - Benchmark TR Gross. LIBD is actively managed, while BBBL is passively managed. Over the past year, LIBD returned -2.03% vs -0.02% for BBBL. Their correlation of 0.87 means they have usually moved in the same direction. LIBD charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for BBBL.
Performance
LIBD vs. BBBL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LIBD achieves a -2.94% return, which is significantly lower than BBBL's -2.30% return.
LIBD
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- -3.26%
- 6M
- -2.95%
- YTD
- -2.94%
- 1Y
- -2.03%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -2.29%
BBBL
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- -3.80%
- 6M
- -3.14%
- YTD
- -2.30%
- 1Y
- -0.02%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 2.16%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $37.61K | $94.14K | $59.58K | |
| $6.78K | $11.16K | $6.65K |
LIBD vs. BBBL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
LIBD LifeX 2065 Inflation-Protected Longevity Income ETF | -2.94% | -0.63% |
BBBL Bondbloxx BBB Rated 10+ Year Corporate Bond ETF | -2.30% | 7.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between LIBD and BBBL is 0.86, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 6, 2025 | 0.87 |
The correlation between LIBD and BBBL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LIBD vs. BBBL — Risk / Return Rank
LIBD
BBBL
LIBD vs. BBBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LifeX 2065 Inflation-Protected Longevity Income ETF (LIBD) and Bondbloxx BBB Rated 10+ Year Corporate Bond ETF (BBBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LIBD | BBBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.03 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.18 | 0.17 | -0.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.38 | 0.39 | -0.76 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LIBD vs. BBBL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LIBD drawdown since its inception was -7.31%, smaller than the maximum BBBL drawdown of -9.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LIBD and BBBL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LIBD | BBBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.31% | -9.43% | +2.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.96% | -5.45% | -1.51% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.96% | -5.31% | -1.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.46% | -3.26% | -0.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.40% | 2.45% | +0.95% |
Volatility
LIBD vs. BBBL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for LifeX 2065 Inflation-Protected Longevity Income ETF (LIBD) is 1.81%, while Bondbloxx BBB Rated 10+ Year Corporate Bond ETF (BBBL) has a volatility of 1.97%. This indicates that LIBD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BBBL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LIBD | BBBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.81% | 1.97% | -0.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.85% | 5.94% | -0.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.85% | 7.67% | +0.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.94% | 9.66% | +0.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.94% | 9.66% | +0.28% |
LIBD vs. BBBL - Expense Ratio Comparison
LIBD has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than BBBL's 0.19% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
LIBD vs. BBBL - Dividend Comparison
LIBD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.89%, more than BBBL's 5.82% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BBBL Bondbloxx BBB Rated 10+ Year Corporate Bond ETF | 5.33% | 5.77% | 5.19% |
LIBD LifeX 2065 Inflation-Protected Longevity Income ETF | 11.89% | 13.52% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LIBD and BBBL have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BBBL has higher volatility (1.97%) compared to LIBD (1.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LIBD dropped -7.31% vs BBBL's -9.43%.
On 1-year performance, BBBL leads with -0.02% vs -2.03% for LIBD. On fees, BBBL is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, LIBD has been the lower-risk option at 1.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, BBBL has performed better with a -0.02% return vs -2.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BBBL is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for LIBD.
LIBD has the higher dividend yield at 11.89%, compared with 5.33% for BBBL.
LIBD is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while BBBL is Long-Term Bond. They also come from different issuers: Stone Ridge and BondBloxx. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for LIBD and 0.19% for BBBL.
BBBL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.12 vs -0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LIBD and BBBL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer