LIAU vs. RINF

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

LIAU (LifeX 2060 Inflation-Protected Longevity Income ETF) and RINF (ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF) are both Inflation-Protected Bonds funds. LIAU is actively managed, while RINF is passively managed. Over the past year, LIAU returned 4.25% vs 2.48% for RINF. At a correlation of -0.30, they often move in opposite directions. LIAU charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for RINF.

Performance

LIAU vs. RINF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in LifeX 2060 Inflation-Protected Longevity Income ETF (LIAU) and ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF (RINF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LIAU achieves a 0.65% return, which is significantly lower than RINF's 2.37% return.

LIAU

• 1D: -0.40%
• 1M: 0.64%
• YTD: 0.65%
• 6M: -0.67%
• 1Y: 4.25%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RINF

• 1D: -0.07%
• 1M: 0.43%
• YTD: 2.37%
• 6M: 3.08%
• 1Y: 2.48%
• 3Y*: 4.84%
• 5Y*: 5.43%
• 10Y*: 4.69%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LIAU vs. RINF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
LIAU LifeX 2060 Inflation-Protected Longevity Income ETF	0.65%	3.53%	-8.28%
RINF ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF	2.37%	1.64%	5.83%

Correlation

The correlation between LIAU and RINF is -0.31, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.31
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 2024	-0.30

Return for Risk

LIAU vs. RINF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LIAU

LIAU Risk / Return Rank: 18
LIAU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
LIAU Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
LIAU Omega Ratio Rank: 18
LIAU Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
LIAU Martin Ratio Rank: 18

RINF

RINF Risk / Return Rank: 18
RINF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
RINF Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
RINF Omega Ratio Rank: 16
RINF Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
RINF Martin Ratio Rank: 18

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LIAU vs. RINF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LifeX 2060 Inflation-Protected Longevity Income ETF (LIAU) and ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF (RINF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LIAU	RINF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.59	0.56	+0.04
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.89	0.82	+0.06
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.10	1.10	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.79	0.96	-0.17
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.79	1.83	-0.03
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LIAU vs. RINF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LIAU Sharpe Ratio is 0.59, which is comparable to the RINF Sharpe Ratio of 0.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LIAU and RINF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LIAU	RINF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.59	0.56	+0.04
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.43	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.37	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.30	0.08	-0.39

Drawdowns

LIAU vs. RINF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LIAU drawdown since its inception was -9.95%, smaller than the maximum RINF drawdown of -43.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LIAU and RINF.

Drawdown Indicators

	LIAU	RINF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.95%	-43.51%	+33.56%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.38%	-2.60%	-2.78%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-9.62%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-13.58%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-29.18%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.43%	-0.66%	-3.77%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.24%	-16.45%	+11.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.37%	1.37%	+1.00%

Volatility

LIAU vs. RINF - Volatility Comparison

LifeX 2060 Inflation-Protected Longevity Income ETF (LIAU) has a higher volatility of 1.93% compared to ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF (RINF) at 1.19%. This indicates that LIAU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RINF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LIAU	RINF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.93%	1.19%	+0.74%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.08%	2.77%	+2.31%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.22%	4.49%	+2.73%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.69%	12.82%	-4.13%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	8.69%	12.57%	-3.88%

LIAU vs. RINF - Expense Ratio Comparison

LIAU has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than RINF's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

LIAU vs. RINF - Dividend Comparison

LIAU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.36%, more than RINF's 3.70% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LIAU LifeX 2060 Inflation-Protected Longevity Income ETF	9.36%	12.93%	1.04%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RINF ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF	3.70%	3.89%	4.68%	5.07%	1.15%	2.76%	0.82%	1.90%	2.47%	2.99%	1.09%	1.83%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LIAU and RINF in my portfolio?

LIAU and RINF have a correlation of -0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LIAU or RINF?

LIAU has higher volatility (1.93%) compared to RINF (1.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LIAU dropped -9.95% vs RINF's -43.51%.

Which ETF is better, LIAU or RINF?

On 1-year performance, LIAU leads with 4.25% vs 2.48% for RINF. On fees, LIAU is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, RINF has been the lower-risk option at 1.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, LIAU or RINF?

Over the 1-year period, LIAU has performed better with a 4.25% return vs 2.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, LIAU or RINF?

LIAU is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for RINF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LIAU or RINF?

LIAU has the higher dividend yield at 9.36%, compared with 3.70% for RINF.

What is the main difference between LIAU and RINF?

They also come from different issuers: Stone Ridge and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for LIAU and 0.30% for RINF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LIAU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.59 vs 0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.