LIAU vs. IBIL

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

LIAU (LifeX 2060 Inflation-Protected Longevity Income ETF) and IBIL (iShares iBonds Oct 2035 Term TIPS ETF) are both Inflation-Protected Bonds funds. LIAU is actively managed, while IBIL is passively managed. Over the past year, LIAU returned 4.55% vs 6.49% for IBIL. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. LIAU charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for IBIL.

Performance

LIAU vs. IBIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in LifeX 2060 Inflation-Protected Longevity Income ETF (LIAU) and iShares iBonds Oct 2035 Term TIPS ETF (IBIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LIAU achieves a 1.05% return, which is significantly lower than IBIL's 1.92% return.

LIAU

• 1D: 0.13%
• 1M: 0.51%
• YTD: 1.05%
• 6M: 0.09%
• 1Y: 4.55%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IBIL

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: -0.25%
• YTD: 1.92%
• 6M: 1.63%
• 1Y: 6.49%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LIAU vs. IBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
LIAU LifeX 2060 Inflation-Protected Longevity Income ETF	1.05%	1.02%
IBIL iShares iBonds Oct 2035 Term TIPS ETF	1.92%	4.75%

Correlation

The correlation between LIAU and IBIL is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.80
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2025	0.81

The correlation between LIAU and IBIL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

LIAU vs. IBIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LIAU

LIAU Risk / Return Rank: 18
LIAU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
LIAU Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
LIAU Omega Ratio Rank: 17
LIAU Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
LIAU Martin Ratio Rank: 16

IBIL

IBIL Risk / Return Rank: 35
IBIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
IBIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
IBIL Omega Ratio Rank: 34
IBIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
IBIL Martin Ratio Rank: 35

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LIAU vs. IBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LifeX 2060 Inflation-Protected Longevity Income ETF (LIAU) and iShares iBonds Oct 2035 Term TIPS ETF (IBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LIAU	IBIL	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.63	1.17	-0.54
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.95	1.65	-0.70
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	1.24	-0.13
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.71	2.32	-1.61
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.63	5.56	-3.94
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LIAU vs. IBIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LIAU Sharpe Ratio is 0.63, which is lower than the IBIL Sharpe Ratio of 1.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LIAU and IBIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LIAU	IBIL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.63	1.17	-0.54
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.28	0.70	-0.97

Drawdowns

LIAU vs. IBIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LIAU drawdown since its inception was -9.95%, which is greater than IBIL's maximum drawdown of -5.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LIAU and IBIL.

Drawdown Indicators

	LIAU	IBIL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.95%	-5.28%	-4.67%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.38%	-2.76%	-2.62%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.05%	-0.33%	-3.72%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.25%	-1.48%	-3.77%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.37%	1.15%	+1.22%

Volatility

LIAU vs. IBIL - Volatility Comparison

LifeX 2060 Inflation-Protected Longevity Income ETF (LIAU) has a higher volatility of 1.97% compared to iShares iBonds Oct 2035 Term TIPS ETF (IBIL) at 1.23%. This indicates that LIAU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LIAU	IBIL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.97%	1.23%	+0.74%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.13%	3.09%	+2.04%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.25%	5.57%	+1.68%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.70%	8.21%	+0.49%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	8.70%	8.21%	+0.49%

LIAU vs. IBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

LIAU has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIL's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

LIAU vs. IBIL - Dividend Comparison

LIAU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.72%, more than IBIL's 3.46% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
IBIL iShares iBonds Oct 2035 Term TIPS ETF	3.46%	2.93%	0.00%
LIAU LifeX 2060 Inflation-Protected Longevity Income ETF	9.33%	12.93%	1.04%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LIAU and IBIL in my portfolio?

LIAU and IBIL have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LIAU or IBIL?

LIAU has higher volatility (1.97%) compared to IBIL (1.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LIAU dropped -9.95% vs IBIL's -5.28%.

Which ETF is better, LIAU or IBIL?

On 1-year performance, IBIL leads with 6.49% vs 4.55% for LIAU. On fees, IBIL is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IBIL has been the lower-risk option at 1.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, LIAU or IBIL?

Over the 1-year period, IBIL has performed better with a 6.49% return vs 4.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, LIAU or IBIL?

IBIL is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for LIAU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LIAU or IBIL?

LIAU has the higher dividend yield at 9.72%, compared with 3.46% for IBIL.

What is the main difference between LIAU and IBIL?

They also come from different issuers: Stone Ridge and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for LIAU and 0.10% for IBIL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IBIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.17 vs 0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.