LIAM vs. LIFT

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

LIAM (LifeX 2055 Inflation-Protected Longevity Income ETF) and LIFT (LifeX 2028 Income Bucket ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LIAM is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund actively managed by Stone Ridge, while LIFT is a Government Bonds fund actively managed by Stone Ridge. Both are actively managed. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.25% expense ratio.

Performance

LIAM vs. LIFT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in LifeX 2055 Inflation-Protected Longevity Income ETF (LIAM) and LifeX 2028 Income Bucket ETF (LIFT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LIAM achieves a 0.41% return, which is significantly lower than LIFT's 0.69% return.

LIAM

• 1D: -0.76%
• 1M: 0.36%
• YTD: 0.41%
• 6M: 0.58%
• 1Y: 3.08%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LIFT

• 1D: -0.03%
• 1M: -0.08%
• YTD: 0.69%
• 6M: 0.79%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LIAM vs. LIFT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
LIAM LifeX 2055 Inflation-Protected Longevity Income ETF	0.41%	-1.00%
LIFT LifeX 2028 Income Bucket ETF	0.69%	1.16%

Correlation

The correlation between LIAM and LIFT is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2025	0.49

Return for Risk

LIAM vs. LIFT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LIAM

LIAM Risk / Return Rank: 16
LIAM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
LIAM Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
LIAM Omega Ratio Rank: 14
LIAM Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
LIAM Martin Ratio Rank: 16

LIFT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LIAM vs. LIFT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LifeX 2055 Inflation-Protected Longevity Income ETF (LIAM) and LifeX 2028 Income Bucket ETF (LIFT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LIAM	LIFT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.49	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.74	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.09	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.70	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.61	—	—

Drawdowns

LIAM vs. LIFT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LIAM drawdown since its inception was -8.39%, which is greater than LIFT's maximum drawdown of -0.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LIAM and LIFT.

Drawdown Indicators

	LIAM	LIFT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.39%	-0.49%	-7.90%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.45%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.53%	-0.14%	-2.39%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.32%	-0.09%	-3.23%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.92%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	LIAM	LIFT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.82%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.67%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.31%	1.27%	+5.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.64%	1.27%	+6.37%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.64%	1.27%	+6.37%

LIAM vs. LIFT - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both LIAM and LIFT have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

LIAM vs. LIFT - Dividend Comparison

LIAM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.47%, less than LIFT's 31.06% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
LIAM LifeX 2055 Inflation-Protected Longevity Income ETF	6.47%	9.02%	1.21%
LIFT LifeX 2028 Income Bucket ETF	31.06%	8.63%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LIAM and LIFT in my portfolio?

LIAM and LIFT have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, LIAM or LIFT?

Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, LIAM or LIFT?

LIAM and LIFT have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LIAM or LIFT?

LIFT has the higher dividend yield at 31.06%, compared with 6.47% for LIAM.

What is the main difference between LIAM and LIFT?

LIAM is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while LIFT is Government Bonds.