LI vs. SPHY
LI (Li Auto Inc.) is a stock, while SPHY (SPDR Portfolio High Yield Bond ETF) is High Yield Bonds fund tracking the ICE BofA US High Yield Index. Over the past 5 years, LI returned -17.12%/yr vs 4.28%/yr for SPHY. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LI vs. SPHY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LI achieves a -26.82% return, which is significantly lower than SPHY's 1.80% return.
LI
- 1D
- -1.90%
- 1M
- -22.03%
- YTD
- -26.82%
- 6M
- -26.16%
- 1Y
- -56.57%
- 3Y*
- -28.02%
- 5Y*
- -17.12%
- 10Y*
- —
SPHY
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 0.54%
- YTD
- 1.80%
- 6M
- 1.80%
- 1Y
- 6.21%
- 3Y*
- 9.17%
- 5Y*
- 4.28%
- 10Y*
- 5.16%
LI vs. SPHY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LI Li Auto Inc. | -26.82% | -29.43% | -35.91% | 83.48% | -36.45% | 11.34% | 86.00% |
SPHY SPDR Portfolio High Yield Bond ETF | 1.80% | 8.59% | 8.54% | 12.81% | -10.57% | 5.61% | 6.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between LI and SPHY is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2020 | 0.26 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LI vs. SPHY — Risk / Return Rank
LI
SPHY
LI vs. SPHY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Li Auto Inc. (LI) and SPDR Portfolio High Yield Bond ETF (SPHY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LI | SPHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.73 | 1.33 | -0.60 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.93 | 2.59 | -3.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.47 | 11.65 | -13.12 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LI vs. SPHY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LI drawdown since its inception was -73.44%, which is greater than SPHY's maximum drawdown of -21.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LI and SPHY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LI | SPHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.44% | -21.97% | -51.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -61.04% | -2.41% | -58.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -73.44% | -4.85% | -68.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -73.44% | -15.29% | -58.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -21.97% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -73.44% | -0.21% | -73.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -40.08% | -2.28% | -37.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 38.63% | 0.53% | +38.10% |
Volatility
LI vs. SPHY - Volatility Comparison
Li Auto Inc. (LI) has a higher volatility of 11.71% compared to SPDR Portfolio High Yield Bond ETF (SPHY) at 0.96%. This indicates that LI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPHY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LI | SPHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.71% | 0.96% | +10.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.65% | 2.97% | +25.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.33% | 3.71% | +35.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 63.38% | 7.18% | +56.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 68.21% | 7.86% | +60.35% |
Dividends
LI vs. SPHY - Dividend Comparison
LI has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.25%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LI Li Auto Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPHY SPDR Portfolio High Yield Bond ETF | 7.25% | 7.38% | 7.80% | 7.30% | 6.47% | 5.13% | 5.63% | 5.73% | 4.09% | 4.41% | 4.27% | 4.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LI and SPHY have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LI has higher volatility (11.71%) compared to SPHY (0.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LI dropped -73.44% vs SPHY's -21.97%.
SPHY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs -1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LI and SPHY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer