LHYAX vs. NEA
LHYAX (Lord Abbett High Yield Fund) is High Yield Bonds fund managed by Lord Abbett, while NEA (Nuveen AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income Fund) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, LHYAX returned 4.52%/yr vs 3.01%/yr for NEA. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LHYAX charges 0.88%/yr vs 1.41%/yr for NEA.
Performance
LHYAX vs. NEA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LHYAX achieves a 1.54% return, which is significantly lower than NEA's 3.22% return. Over the past 10 years, LHYAX has outperformed NEA with an annualized return of 4.52%, while NEA has yielded a comparatively lower 3.01% annualized return.
LHYAX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.73%
- YTD
- 1.54%
- 6M
- 2.32%
- 1Y
- 7.44%
- 3Y*
- 7.49%
- 5Y*
- 2.23%
- 10Y*
- 4.52%
NEA
- 1D
- 0.61%
- 1M
- 3.54%
- YTD
- 3.22%
- 6M
- 3.85%
- 1Y
- 15.57%
- 3Y*
- 9.20%
- 5Y*
- -0.07%
- 10Y*
- 3.01%
LHYAX vs. NEA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LHYAX Lord Abbett High Yield Fund | 1.54% | 7.44% | 7.25% | 9.84% | -14.97% | 6.16% | 4.56% | 15.11% | -5.10% | 8.53% |
NEA Nuveen AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income Fund | 3.22% | 11.31% | 9.50% | 0.75% | -23.32% | 8.16% | 10.07% | 22.42% | -5.72% | 8.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between LHYAX and NEA is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 22, 2002 | 0.19 |
The correlation between LHYAX and NEA shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (all time) to 0.42 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LHYAX vs. NEA — Risk / Return Rank
LHYAX
NEA
LHYAX vs. NEA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett High Yield Fund (LHYAX) and Nuveen AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income Fund (NEA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LHYAX | NEA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.29 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.48 | 2.15 | +0.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.07 | 8.57 | +2.50 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LHYAX vs. NEA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LHYAX drawdown since its inception was -31.68%, smaller than the maximum NEA drawdown of -43.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LHYAX and NEA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LHYAX | NEA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.68% | -43.83% | +12.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.02% | -7.27% | +4.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.87% | -15.16% | +10.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.67% | -36.57% | +17.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -24.23% | -36.57% | +12.34% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.32% | -4.02% | +3.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.07% | -8.00% | +4.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.67% | 1.82% | -1.15% |
Volatility
LHYAX vs. NEA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Lord Abbett High Yield Fund (LHYAX) is 0.97%, while Nuveen AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income Fund (NEA) has a volatility of 2.67%. This indicates that LHYAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NEA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LHYAX | NEA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.97% | 2.67% | -1.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.82% | 8.67% | -5.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.67% | 10.72% | -7.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.09% | 11.52% | -6.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.73% | 11.82% | -6.09% |
LHYAX vs. NEA - Expense Ratio Comparison
LHYAX has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is lower than NEA's 1.41% expense ratio.
Dividends
LHYAX vs. NEA - Dividend Comparison
LHYAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.22%, more than NEA's 7.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LHYAX Lord Abbett High Yield Fund | 7.22% | 7.13% | 6.02% | 5.84% | 4.60% | 4.91% | 5.15% | 5.47% | 6.29% | 5.65% | 5.85% | 6.08% |
NEA Nuveen AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income Fund | 7.13% | 7.36% | 6.63% | 3.95% | 5.49% | 4.50% | 4.45% | 4.46% | 5.40% | 5.33% | 5.70% | 5.71% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LHYAX and NEA have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NEA has higher volatility (2.67%) compared to LHYAX (0.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LHYAX dropped -31.68% vs NEA's -43.83%.
LHYAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LHYAX and NEA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer