LHKG.DE vs. LSMC.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

LHKG.DE (Lyxor MSCI China ESG Leaders Extra UCITS ETF Dist) and LSMC.DE (Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LHKG.DE is a China Equities fund tracking the MSCI China Select ESG Rating and Trend Leaders, while LSMC.DE is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment ESG Filtered NET USD Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, LHKG.DE returned 2.55%/yr vs 28.49%/yr for LSMC.DE. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LHKG.DE charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for LSMC.DE.

Performance

LHKG.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Lyxor MSCI China ESG Leaders Extra UCITS ETF Dist (LHKG.DE) and Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF (LSMC.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LHKG.DE achieves a -6.38% return, which is significantly lower than LSMC.DE's 63.83% return. Over the past 10 years, LHKG.DE has underperformed LSMC.DE with an annualized return of 2.55%, while LSMC.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 28.49% annualized return.

LHKG.DE

• 1D: -0.30%
• 1M: -2.25%
• YTD: -6.38%
• 6M: -8.89%
• 1Y: 2.88%
• 3Y*: 6.17%
• 5Y*: -2.20%
• 10Y*: 2.55%

LSMC.DE

• 1D: -3.34%
• 1M: 12.86%
• YTD: 63.83%
• 6M: 63.41%
• 1Y: 126.99%
• 3Y*: 62.06%
• 5Y*: 36.20%
• 10Y*: 28.49%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LHKG.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LHKG.DE Lyxor MSCI China ESG Leaders Extra UCITS ETF Dist	-6.38%	21.50%	20.37%	-17.49%	-7.90%	-6.59%	-10.39%	16.35%	-8.73%	22.42%
LSMC.DE Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF	63.83%	32.60%	66.54%	74.46%	-34.66%	37.56%	23.03%	39.73%	-5.73%	12.36%

Correlation

The correlation between LHKG.DE and LSMC.DE is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.43
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.28
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.33
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.48
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2008	0.53

The correlation between LHKG.DE and LSMC.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.28 (3 years) to 0.53 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

LHKG.DE vs. LSMC.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LHKG.DE

LHKG.DE Risk / Return Rank: 11
LHKG.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
LHKG.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
LHKG.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 11
LHKG.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
LHKG.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 11

LSMC.DE

LSMC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 94
LSMC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
LSMC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
LSMC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 91
LSMC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
LSMC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LHKG.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor MSCI China ESG Leaders Extra UCITS ETF Dist (LHKG.DE) and Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF (LSMC.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LHKG.DE	LSMC.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.18	4.27	-4.10
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.40	4.60	-4.20
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.05	1.59	-0.54
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.20	10.37	-10.17
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.38	32.83	-32.45
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LHKG.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LHKG.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.18, which is lower than the LSMC.DE Sharpe Ratio of 4.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LHKG.DE and LSMC.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LHKG.DE	LSMC.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.18	4.27	-4.10
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.09	1.15	-1.23
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.11	1.09	-0.97
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.12	0.82	-0.69

Drawdowns

LHKG.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LHKG.DE drawdown since its inception was -58.71%, which is greater than LSMC.DE's maximum drawdown of -39.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LHKG.DE and LSMC.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	LHKG.DE	LSMC.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.71%	-39.77%	-18.94%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.64%	-12.53%	-5.11%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.41%	-36.22%	+9.81%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-43.07%	-39.77%	-3.30%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-45.11%	-39.77%	-5.34%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-16.18%	-3.34%	-12.84%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-19.83%	-9.37%	-10.46%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.15%	3.96%	+5.19%

Volatility

LHKG.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lyxor MSCI China ESG Leaders Extra UCITS ETF Dist (LHKG.DE) is 8.31%, while Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF (LSMC.DE) has a volatility of 11.23%. This indicates that LHKG.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LSMC.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LHKG.DE	LSMC.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.31%	11.23%	-2.92%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.08%	22.18%	-8.10%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.89%	30.40%	-10.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.93%	31.21%	-6.28%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.47%	26.06%	-3.59%

LHKG.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

LHKG.DE has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than LSMC.DE's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

LHKG.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Dividend Comparison

LHKG.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%, while LSMC.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LHKG.DE Lyxor MSCI China ESG Leaders Extra UCITS ETF Dist	1.61%	1.50%	2.18%	0.17%	3.78%	1.35%	2.46%	2.58%	3.04%	2.30%	3.38%	3.88%
LSMC.DE Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LHKG.DE and LSMC.DE in my portfolio?

LHKG.DE and LSMC.DE have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, LHKG.DE or LSMC.DE?

On fees, LSMC.DE is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, LHKG.DE or LSMC.DE?

LSMC.DE is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for LHKG.DE.

What is the main difference between LHKG.DE and LSMC.DE?

LHKG.DE is categorized as China Equities, while LSMC.DE is Semiconductors. LHKG.DE tracks MSCI China Select ESG Rating and Trend Leaders, while LSMC.DE tracks MSCI ACWI Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment ESG Filtered NET USD Index. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for LHKG.DE and 0.45% for LSMC.DE.