PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LGWIX vs. FYMIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

LGWIX vs. FYMIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ladenburg Growth Fund (LGWIX) and Fidelity Sustainable Multi-Asset Fund (FYMIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

LGWIX vs. FYMIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
LGWIX
Ladenburg Growth Fund
-3.17%11.60%4.69%18.29%-13.16%
FYMIX
Fidelity Sustainable Multi-Asset Fund
-4.40%18.95%11.09%16.15%-15.71%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LGWIX achieves a -3.17% return, which is significantly higher than FYMIX's -4.40% return.


LGWIX

1D
-0.35%
1M
-6.51%
YTD
-3.17%
6M
-1.48%
1Y
11.99%
3Y*
8.27%
5Y*
4.25%
10Y*
7.31%

FYMIX

1D
0.09%
1M
-8.20%
YTD
-4.40%
6M
-1.39%
1Y
14.95%
3Y*
11.31%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


LGWIX vs. FYMIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LGWIX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than FYMIX's 0.05% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

LGWIX vs. FYMIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LGWIX
LGWIX Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
LGWIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LGWIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
LGWIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
LGWIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
LGWIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

FYMIX
FYMIX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
FYMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FYMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
FYMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
FYMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
FYMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LGWIX vs. FYMIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ladenburg Growth Fund (LGWIX) and Fidelity Sustainable Multi-Asset Fund (FYMIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LGWIXFYMIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.87

1.13

-0.26

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.31

1.63

-0.32

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.24

-0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.06

1.51

-0.45

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.98

6.25

-1.27

LGWIX vs. FYMIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LGWIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.87, which is comparable to the FYMIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LGWIX and FYMIX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LGWIXFYMIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

1.13

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.42

+0.04

Correlation

The correlation between LGWIX and FYMIX is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

LGWIX vs. FYMIX - Dividend Comparison

LGWIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.73%, more than FYMIX's 3.85% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
LGWIX
Ladenburg Growth Fund
4.73%4.58%0.00%3.43%1.00%2.45%0.64%1.61%1.34%0.99%
FYMIX
Fidelity Sustainable Multi-Asset Fund
3.85%3.69%1.84%1.78%1.79%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

LGWIX vs. FYMIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LGWIX drawdown since its inception was -26.93%, which is greater than FYMIX's maximum drawdown of -22.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LGWIX and FYMIX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


LGWIXFYMIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.93%

-22.70%

-4.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.44%

-8.95%

-1.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.92%

-8.72%

+1.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.47%

-5.83%

+0.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.21%

2.16%

+0.05%

Volatility

LGWIX vs. FYMIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Ladenburg Growth Fund (LGWIX) is 3.70%, while Fidelity Sustainable Multi-Asset Fund (FYMIX) has a volatility of 4.80%. This indicates that LGWIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FYMIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


LGWIXFYMIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.70%

4.80%

-1.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.66%

8.07%

-0.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.57%

13.20%

+1.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.06%

12.67%

+2.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.72%

12.67%

+2.05%