PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LGUK.L vs. BCOG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LGUK.L vs. BCOG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in L&G UK Equity UCITS ETF (LGUK.L) and L&G All Commodities UCITS ETF (BCOG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LGUK.L achieves a 3.73% return, which is significantly lower than BCOG.L's 24.98% return.


LGUK.L

1D
-1.06%
1M
-0.31%
YTD
3.73%
6M
8.03%
1Y
17.97%
3Y*
13.62%
5Y*
11.33%
10Y*

BCOG.L

1D
-1.35%
1M
-2.79%
YTD
24.98%
6M
23.49%
1Y
38.11%
3Y*
12.52%
5Y*
12.42%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LGUK.L vs. BCOG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
LGUK.L
L&G UK Equity UCITS ETF
3.73%24.95%10.56%6.64%5.26%17.94%-12.15%20.11%-7.13%
BCOG.L
L&G All Commodities UCITS ETF
24.98%8.16%6.13%-12.32%29.36%29.04%-6.24%1.82%-3.52%

Correlation

The correlation between LGUK.L and BCOG.L is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.07

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 14, 2018

0.19

The correlation between LGUK.L and BCOG.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (1 year) to 0.19 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

LGUK.L vs. BCOG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
LGUK.L
BCOG.L

Financial Services

25.3%
17.8%

Healthcare

14.7%

-

Industrials

14.7%

-

Consumer Defensive

14.5%
9.7%

Energy

12.1%

-

Basic Materials

5.9%
35.8%

Utilities

5.5%

-

Consumer Cyclical

3.7%
12.9%

Communication Services

2.5%
12.3%

Technology

0.7%
5.6%

Real Estate

0.6%
5.8%

Financial Services

LGUK.L
25.3%
BCOG.L
17.8%

Healthcare

LGUK.L
14.7%
BCOG.L

-

Industrials

LGUK.L
14.7%
BCOG.L

-

Consumer Defensive

LGUK.L
14.5%
BCOG.L
9.7%

Energy

LGUK.L
12.1%
BCOG.L

-

Basic Materials

LGUK.L
5.9%
BCOG.L
35.8%

Utilities

LGUK.L
5.5%
BCOG.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

LGUK.L
3.7%
BCOG.L
12.9%

Communication Services

LGUK.L
2.5%
BCOG.L
12.3%

Technology

LGUK.L
0.7%
BCOG.L
5.6%

Real Estate

LGUK.L
0.6%
BCOG.L
5.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LGUK.L vs. BCOG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LGUK.L
LGUK.L Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
LGUK.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LGUK.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
LGUK.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
LGUK.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
LGUK.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

BCOG.L
BCOG.L Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
BCOG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BCOG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
BCOG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
BCOG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
BCOG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LGUK.L vs. BCOG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G UK Equity UCITS ETF (LGUK.L) and L&G All Commodities UCITS ETF (BCOG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LGUK.LBCOG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.37

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.92

4.43

-2.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.51

10.23

-3.72

LGUK.L vs. BCOG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LGUK.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.24, which is lower than the BCOG.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LGUK.L and BCOG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LGUK.LBCOG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.24

2.05

-0.81

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

0.74

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.49

+0.03

Drawdowns

LGUK.L vs. BCOG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LGUK.L drawdown since its inception was -33.76%, which is greater than BCOG.L's maximum drawdown of -28.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LGUK.L and BCOG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LGUK.LBCOG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.76%

-28.15%

-5.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.30%

-8.57%

-0.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.30%

-14.48%

+2.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.30%

-27.76%

+15.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.71%

-5.16%

-0.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.82%

-11.67%

+6.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.75%

3.72%

-0.97%

Volatility

LGUK.L vs. BCOG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for L&G UK Equity UCITS ETF (LGUK.L) is 4.30%, while L&G All Commodities UCITS ETF (BCOG.L) has a volatility of 6.06%. This indicates that LGUK.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BCOG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LGUK.LBCOG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.30%

6.06%

-1.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.53%

15.89%

-3.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.42%

18.51%

-4.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.86%

16.89%

-3.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.31%

15.71%

+0.60%

LGUK.L vs. BCOG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

LGUK.L has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than BCOG.L's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

LGUK.L vs. BCOG.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither LGUK.L nor BCOG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


LGUK.L and BCOG.L have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LGUK.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LGUK.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for BCOG.L.

LGUK.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while BCOG.L is Commodities. LGUK.L tracks FTSE AllSh TR GBP, while BCOG.L tracks Bloomberg Commodity. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for LGUK.L and 0.15% for BCOG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LGUK.L and BCOG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer