BCOG.L vs. CMFP.L
Compare and contrast key facts about L&G All Commodities UCITS ETF (BCOG.L) and L&G Longer Dated All Commodities UCITS ETF (CMFP.L).
BCOG.L and CMFP.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BCOG.L is a passively managed fund by Legal & General that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Commodity. It was launched on Jul 6, 2017. CMFP.L is a passively managed fund by Legal & General that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Commodity 3 Month Forward. It was launched on Mar 15, 2010. Both BCOG.L and CMFP.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
BCOG.L vs. CMFP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BCOG.L vs. CMFP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCOG.L L&G All Commodities UCITS ETF | 27.04% | 8.16% | 6.13% | -12.32% | 29.36% | 29.04% | -6.24% | 1.82% | -4.64% | 1.28% |
CMFP.L L&G Longer Dated All Commodities UCITS ETF | 18.32% | 8.49% | 6.86% | -11.43% | 32.79% | 34.61% | -0.92% | 3.99% | -3.16% | 1.77% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BCOG.L achieves a 27.04% return, which is significantly higher than CMFP.L's 18.32% return.
BCOG.L
- 1D
- 0.56%
- 1M
- 14.55%
- YTD
- 27.04%
- 6M
- 34.77%
- 1Y
- 29.94%
- 3Y*
- 11.55%
- 5Y*
- 15.07%
- 10Y*
- —
CMFP.L
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- 7.90%
- YTD
- 18.32%
- 6M
- 25.33%
- 1Y
- 21.17%
- 3Y*
- 9.02%
- 5Y*
- 15.47%
- 10Y*
- 10.17%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BCOG.L vs. CMFP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
BCOG.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than CMFP.L's 0.30% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BCOG.L vs. CMFP.L — Risk / Return Rank
BCOG.L
CMFP.L
BCOG.L vs. CMFP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G All Commodities UCITS ETF (BCOG.L) and L&G Longer Dated All Commodities UCITS ETF (CMFP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BCOG.L | CMFP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.80 | 1.47 | +0.33 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.41 | 1.96 | +0.45 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.27 | +0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.11 | 2.31 | +0.80 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.97 | 4.56 | +1.40 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BCOG.L | CMFP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.80 | 1.47 | +0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 | 1.05 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.73 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.27 | +0.26 |
Correlation
The correlation between BCOG.L and CMFP.L is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
BCOG.L vs. CMFP.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither BCOG.L nor CMFP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
BCOG.L vs. CMFP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BCOG.L drawdown since its inception was -28.15%, smaller than the maximum CMFP.L drawdown of -50.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCOG.L and CMFP.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BCOG.L | CMFP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.15% | -50.47% | +22.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.54% | -9.30% | -0.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.76% | -23.51% | -4.25% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -23.95% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.68% | +0.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.84% | -24.76% | +12.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.98% | 4.57% | +0.41% |
Volatility
BCOG.L vs. CMFP.L - Volatility Comparison
L&G All Commodities UCITS ETF (BCOG.L) has a higher volatility of 7.66% compared to L&G Longer Dated All Commodities UCITS ETF (CMFP.L) at 5.82%. This indicates that BCOG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CMFP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BCOG.L | CMFP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.66% | 5.82% | +1.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.98% | 11.02% | +1.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.56% | 14.36% | +2.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.42% | 14.71% | +1.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.45% | 13.87% | +1.58% |