BCOG.L vs. VUSA.L

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about L&G All Commodities UCITS ETF (BCOG.L) and Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (VUSA.L).

BCOG.L and VUSA.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BCOG.L is a passively managed fund by Legal & General that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Commodity. It was launched on Jul 6, 2017. VUSA.L is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on May 14, 2019. Both BCOG.L and VUSA.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

BCOG.L vs. VUSA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in L&G All Commodities UCITS ETF (BCOG.L) and Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (VUSA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

BCOG.L vs. VUSA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BCOG.L L&G All Commodities UCITS ETF	24.31%	8.16%	6.13%	-12.32%	29.36%	29.04%	-6.24%	1.82%	-4.64%	1.28%
VUSA.L Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF	-3.13%	9.39%	27.33%	19.81%	-9.02%	30.98%	13.66%	26.54%	-0.12%	6.07%

Different Trading Currencies

BCOG.L is traded in GBp, while VUSA.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the VUSA.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BCOG.L achieves a 24.31% return, which is significantly higher than VUSA.L's -3.13% return.

BCOG.L

• 1D: -2.15%
• 1M: 9.29%
• YTD: 24.31%
• 6M: 32.11%
• 1Y: 26.91%
• 3Y*: 10.75%
• 5Y*: 14.57%
• 10Y*: —

VUSA.L

• 1D: 1.52%
• 1M: -3.31%
• YTD: -3.13%
• 6M: 0.16%
• 1Y: 14.71%
• 3Y*: 15.77%
• 5Y*: 12.63%
• 10Y*: 14.61%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BCOG.L vs. VUSA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

BCOG.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than VUSA.L's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

BCOG.L

L&G All Commodities UCITS ETF

VUSA.L

Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF

Return for Risk

BCOG.L vs. VUSA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BCOG.L

BCOG.L Risk / Return Rank: 78
BCOG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
BCOG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
BCOG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 77
BCOG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
BCOG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 65

VUSA.L

VUSA.L Risk / Return Rank: 59
VUSA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
VUSA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
VUSA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 51
VUSA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
VUSA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 67

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BCOG.L vs. VUSA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G All Commodities UCITS ETF (BCOG.L) and Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (VUSA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BCOG.L	VUSA.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.61	0.96	+0.64
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.17	1.40	+0.77
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.20	+0.10
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.12	2.06	+1.06
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.02	7.07	-0.05
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BCOG.L vs. VUSA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BCOG.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is higher than the VUSA.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BCOG.L and VUSA.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BCOG.L	VUSA.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.61	0.96	+0.64
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.89	0.88	+0.01
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.93	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.51	1.00	-0.49

Correlation

The correlation between BCOG.L and VUSA.L is 0.25, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

BCOG.L vs. VUSA.L - Dividend Comparison

BCOG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VUSA.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BCOG.L L&G All Commodities UCITS ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VUSA.L Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF	0.99%	0.95%	1.00%	1.24%	1.41%	1.04%	1.44%	1.50%	1.72%	1.61%	1.58%	1.73%

Drawdowns

BCOG.L vs. VUSA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCOG.L drawdown since its inception was -28.15%, which is greater than VUSA.L's maximum drawdown of -25.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCOG.L and VUSA.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	BCOG.L	VUSA.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.15%	-25.47%	-2.68%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.54%	-10.49%	+0.95%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.76%	-20.94%	-6.82%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-25.47%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.15%	-4.76%	+2.61%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.83%	-3.22%	-8.61%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.80%	2.07%	+1.73%

Volatility

BCOG.L vs. VUSA.L - Volatility Comparison

L&G All Commodities UCITS ETF (BCOG.L) has a higher volatility of 7.99% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (VUSA.L) at 3.74%. This indicates that BCOG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VUSA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BCOG.L	VUSA.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.99%	3.74%	+4.25%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.19%	8.25%	+4.94%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.68%	15.31%	+1.37%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.45%	14.37%	+2.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.47%	15.67%	-0.20%