PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LGUG.L vs. USFM.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LGUG.L vs. USFM.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in L&G US Equity UCITS ETF (LGUG.L) and UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA Select Factor Mix UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (USFM.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LGUG.L achieves a 10.49% return, which is significantly lower than USFM.L's 12.16% return.


LGUG.L

1D
-0.07%
1M
5.71%
YTD
10.49%
6M
10.18%
1Y
28.95%
3Y*
19.37%
5Y*
14.90%
10Y*

USFM.L

1D
0.33%
1M
5.20%
YTD
12.16%
6M
12.28%
1Y
24.78%
3Y*
16.00%
5Y*
11.61%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LGUG.L vs. USFM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
LGUG.L
L&G US Equity UCITS ETF
10.49%9.75%27.44%21.53%-10.98%29.52%15.44%26.42%
USFM.L
UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA Select Factor Mix UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
12.16%5.73%20.11%10.47%-3.22%26.12%10.79%23.47%

Correlation

The correlation between LGUG.L and USFM.L is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 8, 2019

0.74

The correlation between LGUG.L and USFM.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.74 (all time) to 0.86 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

LGUG.L vs. USFM.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
LGUG.L
USFM.L

Technology

38.3%
20.8%

Communication Services

11.2%
6.4%

Financial Services

11.1%
15.2%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
6.4%

Healthcare

8.6%
13.9%

Industrials

7.6%
15.3%

Consumer Defensive

4.7%
8.7%

Energy

3.3%
3.3%

Utilities

2.0%
4.0%

Real Estate

1.6%
2.9%

Basic Materials

1.6%
3.2%

Technology

LGUG.L
38.3%
USFM.L
20.8%

Communication Services

LGUG.L
11.2%
USFM.L
6.4%

Financial Services

LGUG.L
11.1%
USFM.L
15.2%

Consumer Cyclical

LGUG.L
10.1%
USFM.L
6.4%

Healthcare

LGUG.L
8.6%
USFM.L
13.9%

Industrials

LGUG.L
7.6%
USFM.L
15.3%

Consumer Defensive

LGUG.L
4.7%
USFM.L
8.7%

Energy

LGUG.L
3.3%
USFM.L
3.3%

Utilities

LGUG.L
2.0%
USFM.L
4.0%

Real Estate

LGUG.L
1.6%
USFM.L
2.9%

Basic Materials

LGUG.L
1.6%
USFM.L
3.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LGUG.L vs. USFM.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LGUG.L
LGUG.L Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
LGUG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LGUG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
LGUG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
LGUG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
LGUG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

USFM.L
USFM.L Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
USFM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USFM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
USFM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
USFM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
USFM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LGUG.L vs. USFM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G US Equity UCITS ETF (LGUG.L) and UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA Select Factor Mix UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (USFM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LGUG.LUSFM.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.46

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.60

4.51

-0.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.19

16.06

-3.87

LGUG.L vs. USFM.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LGUG.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.66, which is comparable to the USFM.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LGUG.L and USFM.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LGUG.LUSFM.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.66

2.61

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.03

0.88

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.20

0.84

+0.36

Drawdowns

LGUG.L vs. USFM.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LGUG.L drawdown since its inception was -24.75%, smaller than the maximum USFM.L drawdown of -27.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LGUG.L and USFM.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LGUG.LUSFM.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.75%

-27.52%

+2.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.01%

-5.47%

-2.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.49%

-17.40%

-4.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.49%

-17.40%

-4.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.30%

0.00%

-0.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.78%

-3.49%

-0.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.37%

1.54%

+0.83%

Volatility

LGUG.L vs. USFM.L - Volatility Comparison

L&G US Equity UCITS ETF (LGUG.L) and UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA Select Factor Mix UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (USFM.L) have volatilities of 2.89% and 2.78%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LGUG.LUSFM.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.89%

2.78%

+0.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.56%

6.77%

+0.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.83%

9.46%

+1.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.84%

13.21%

+1.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.37%

15.32%

+2.05%

LGUG.L vs. USFM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

LGUG.L has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than USFM.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

LGUG.L vs. USFM.L - Dividend Comparison

LGUG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while USFM.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.07%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
LGUG.L
L&G US Equity UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
USFM.L
UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA Select Factor Mix UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
1.07%1.20%1.14%1.37%1.22%1.01%1.34%1.30%1.37%0.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


LGUG.L and USFM.L have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LGUG.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LGUG.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for USFM.L.

Both ETFs track Russell 1000 TR USD. They also come from different issuers: Legal & General and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for LGUG.L and 0.25% for USFM.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LGUG.L and USFM.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer