LGUG.L vs. ISDU.L
LGUG.L (L&G US Equity UCITS ETF) and ISDU.L (iShares MSCI USA Islamic UCITS ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - LGUG.L tracks the Russell 1000 TR USD while ISDU.L tracks the MSCI USA Islamic Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, LGUG.L returned 14.90%/yr vs 15.57%/yr for ISDU.L. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LGUG.L charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for ISDU.L.
Performance
LGUG.L vs. ISDU.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
LGUG.L is traded in GBp, while ISDU.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ISDU.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LGUG.L achieves a 10.49% return, which is significantly lower than ISDU.L's 23.26% return.
LGUG.L
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 5.71%
- YTD
- 10.49%
- 6M
- 10.18%
- 1Y
- 28.95%
- 3Y*
- 19.37%
- 5Y*
- 14.90%
- 10Y*
- —
ISDU.L
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 11.89%
- YTD
- 23.26%
- 6M
- 22.97%
- 1Y
- 42.68%
- 3Y*
- 17.07%
- 5Y*
- 15.57%
- 10Y*
- 13.26%
LGUG.L vs. ISDU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LGUG.L L&G US Equity UCITS ETF | 10.49% | 9.75% | 27.44% | 21.53% | -10.98% | 29.52% | 15.44% | 26.42% |
ISDU.L iShares MSCI USA Islamic UCITS ETF | 23.26% | 8.03% | 11.27% | 19.55% | -1.43% | 30.82% | 3.71% | 14.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between LGUG.L and ISDU.L is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 8, 2019 | 0.70 |
The correlation between LGUG.L and ISDU.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (all time) to 0.83 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
LGUG.L vs. ISDU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
LGUG.L
ISDU.L
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
LGUG.L
ISDU.L
Communication Services
LGUG.L
ISDU.L
Financial Services
LGUG.L
ISDU.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
LGUG.L
ISDU.L
Healthcare
LGUG.L
ISDU.L
Industrials
LGUG.L
ISDU.L
Consumer Defensive
LGUG.L
ISDU.L
Energy
LGUG.L
ISDU.L
Utilities
LGUG.L
ISDU.L
Real Estate
LGUG.L
ISDU.L
Basic Materials
LGUG.L
ISDU.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LGUG.L vs. ISDU.L — Risk / Return Rank
LGUG.L
ISDU.L
LGUG.L vs. ISDU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G US Equity UCITS ETF (LGUG.L) and iShares MSCI USA Islamic UCITS ETF (ISDU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LGUG.L | ISDU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.58 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.60 | 7.26 | -3.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.19 | 22.62 | -10.43 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LGUG.L | ISDU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.66 | 3.26 | -0.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.03 | 1.00 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.81 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.20 | 0.80 | +0.39 |
Drawdowns
LGUG.L vs. ISDU.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LGUG.L drawdown since its inception was -24.75%, roughly equal to the maximum ISDU.L drawdown of -24.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LGUG.L and ISDU.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LGUG.L | ISDU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.75% | -24.76% | +0.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.01% | -5.85% | -2.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.49% | -24.06% | +2.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.49% | -24.06% | +2.57% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -24.76% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.30% | -0.70% | +0.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.78% | -3.88% | +0.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.37% | 1.88% | +0.49% |
Volatility
LGUG.L vs. ISDU.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for L&G US Equity UCITS ETF (LGUG.L) is 2.89%, while iShares MSCI USA Islamic UCITS ETF (ISDU.L) has a volatility of 5.05%. This indicates that LGUG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ISDU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LGUG.L | ISDU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.89% | 5.05% | -2.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.56% | 9.91% | -2.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.83% | 13.03% | -2.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.84% | 15.64% | -0.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.37% | 16.42% | +0.95% |
LGUG.L vs. ISDU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
LGUG.L has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than ISDU.L's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
LGUG.L vs. ISDU.L - Dividend Comparison
LGUG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ISDU.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ISDU.L iShares MSCI USA Islamic UCITS ETF | 0.62% | 0.74% | 0.90% | 1.10% | 1.52% | 1.01% | 1.39% | 1.37% | 1.49% | 1.38% | 1.34% | 1.43% |
LGUG.L L&G US Equity UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LGUG.L and ISDU.L have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LGUG.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LGUG.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for ISDU.L.
LGUG.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD, while ISDU.L tracks MSCI USA Islamic Index. They also come from different issuers: Legal & General and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for LGUG.L and 0.30% for ISDU.L.
Find the right allocation for LGUG.L and ISDU.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer