LGUG.L vs. 5HEP.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

LGUG.L (L&G US Equity UCITS ETF) and 5HEP.L (Ossiam ESG Low Carbon Shiller Barclays CAPE® US Sector UCITS ETF 1A (USD)) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds tracking the Russell 1000 TR USD, from Legal & General and Natixis respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, LGUG.L returned 14.90%/yr vs 3.50%/yr for 5HEP.L. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LGUG.L charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for 5HEP.L.

Performance

LGUG.L vs. 5HEP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in L&G US Equity UCITS ETF (LGUG.L) and Ossiam ESG Low Carbon Shiller Barclays CAPE® US Sector UCITS ETF 1A (USD) (5HEP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LGUG.L achieves a 10.49% return, which is significantly higher than 5HEP.L's -0.99% return.

LGUG.L

• 1D: -0.07%
• 1M: 5.71%
• YTD: 10.49%
• 6M: 10.18%
• 1Y: 28.95%
• 3Y*: 19.37%
• 5Y*: 14.90%
• 10Y*: —

5HEP.L

• 1D: 1.36%
• 1M: 0.44%
• YTD: -0.99%
• 6M: 1.11%
• 1Y: 6.57%
• 3Y*: 1.62%
• 5Y*: 3.50%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LGUG.L vs. 5HEP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
LGUG.L L&G US Equity UCITS ETF	10.49%	9.75%	27.44%	21.53%	-10.98%	29.52%	15.44%	26.42%
5HEP.L Ossiam ESG Low Carbon Shiller Barclays CAPE® US Sector UCITS ETF 1A (USD)	-0.99%	-2.61%	5.42%	9.48%	-6.21%	23.62%	19.82%	24.04%

Correlation

The correlation between LGUG.L and 5HEP.L is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.45
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.59
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.73
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 8, 2019	0.66

Over the past year, the correlation between LGUG.L and 5HEP.L has dropped to 0.45 - well below their long-term average of 0.66, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

LGUG.L vs. 5HEP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LGUG.L

LGUG.L Risk / Return Rank: 78
LGUG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
LGUG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
LGUG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 83
LGUG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
LGUG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 67

5HEP.L

5HEP.L Risk / Return Rank: 19
5HEP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
5HEP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
5HEP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 18
5HEP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
5HEP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 19

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LGUG.L vs. 5HEP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G US Equity UCITS ETF (LGUG.L) and Ossiam ESG Low Carbon Shiller Barclays CAPE® US Sector UCITS ETF 1A (USD) (5HEP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LGUG.L	5HEP.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.66	0.63	+2.03
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.59	0.95	+2.64
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.50	1.11	+0.39
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.60	0.84	+2.75
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.19	2.12	+10.07
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LGUG.L vs. 5HEP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LGUG.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.66, which is higher than the 5HEP.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LGUG.L and 5HEP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LGUG.L	5HEP.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.66	0.63	+2.03
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.03	0.25	+0.78
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.20	0.51	+0.68

Drawdowns

LGUG.L vs. 5HEP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LGUG.L drawdown since its inception was -24.75%, roughly equal to the maximum 5HEP.L drawdown of -24.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LGUG.L and 5HEP.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	LGUG.L	5HEP.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.75%	-24.16%	-0.59%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.01%	-7.77%	-0.24%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.49%	-19.08%	-2.41%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.49%	-19.08%	-2.41%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.30%	-8.21%	+7.91%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.78%	-5.18%	+1.40%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.37%	3.09%	-0.72%

Volatility

LGUG.L vs. 5HEP.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for L&G US Equity UCITS ETF (LGUG.L) is 2.89%, while Ossiam ESG Low Carbon Shiller Barclays CAPE® US Sector UCITS ETF 1A (USD) (5HEP.L) has a volatility of 3.64%. This indicates that LGUG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 5HEP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LGUG.L	5HEP.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.89%	3.64%	-0.75%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.56%	7.56%	0.00%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.83%	10.42%	+0.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.84%	13.91%	+0.93%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.37%	16.02%	+1.35%

LGUG.L vs. 5HEP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

LGUG.L has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than 5HEP.L's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

LGUG.L vs. 5HEP.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither LGUG.L nor 5HEP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LGUG.L and 5HEP.L in my portfolio?

LGUG.L and 5HEP.L have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, LGUG.L or 5HEP.L?

On fees, LGUG.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, LGUG.L or 5HEP.L?

LGUG.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for 5HEP.L.

What is the main difference between LGUG.L and 5HEP.L?

Both ETFs track Russell 1000 TR USD. They also come from different issuers: Legal & General and Natixis. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for LGUG.L and 0.75% for 5HEP.L.