LGPIX vs. FGKFX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

LGPIX (ProFunds Large Cap Growth ProFund) and FGKFX (Fidelity Growth Company K6 Fund) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, LGPIX returned -13.31%/yr vs 16.32%/yr for FGKFX. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. LGPIX charges 1.59%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for FGKFX.

Performance

LGPIX vs. FGKFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProFunds Large Cap Growth ProFund (LGPIX) and Fidelity Growth Company K6 Fund (FGKFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LGPIX achieves a 10.35% return, which is significantly lower than FGKFX's 22.73% return.

LGPIX

• 1D: -0.85%
• 1M: 0.13%
• YTD: 10.35%
• 6M: 9.00%
• 1Y: 28.02%
• 3Y*: -21.42%
• 5Y*: -13.31%
• 10Y*: 1.80%

FGKFX

• 1D: -1.20%
• 1M: 1.38%
• YTD: 22.73%
• 6M: 16.53%
• 1Y: 48.45%
• 3Y*: 31.24%
• 5Y*: 16.32%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LGPIX vs. FGKFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
LGPIX ProFunds Large Cap Growth ProFund	10.35%	20.25%	-66.25%	27.54%	-30.72%	38.06%	30.61%	9.94%
FGKFX Fidelity Growth Company K6 Fund	22.73%	21.67%	35.46%	46.02%	-32.62%	22.06%	68.76%	15.07%

Correlation

The correlation between LGPIX and FGKFX is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.95
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.94
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2019	0.93

The correlation between LGPIX and FGKFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

LGPIX vs. FGKFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LGPIX

LGPIX Risk / Return Rank: 38
LGPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
LGPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
LGPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 38
LGPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
LGPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 39

FGKFX

FGKFX Risk / Return Rank: 81
FGKFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
FGKFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
FGKFX Omega Ratio Rank: 70
FGKFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
FGKFX Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LGPIX vs. FGKFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProFunds Large Cap Growth ProFund (LGPIX) and Fidelity Growth Company K6 Fund (FGKFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LGPIX	FGKFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.75	2.53	-0.78
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.38	3.14	-0.76
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.42	-0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.08	4.40	-2.32
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.12	17.06	-8.93

LGPIX vs. FGKFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LGPIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.75, which is lower than the FGKFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LGPIX and FGKFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LGPIX vs. FGKFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LGPIX drawdown since its inception was -78.62%, which is greater than FGKFX's maximum drawdown of -40.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LGPIX and FGKFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	LGPIX	FGKFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-78.62%	-40.14%	-38.48%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.29%	-11.40%	-2.89%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-78.62%	-27.38%	-51.24%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-78.62%	-40.14%	-38.48%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-78.62%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-65.14%	-1.75%	-63.39%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.27%	-9.96%	-2.31%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.65%	2.93%	+0.72%

Volatility

LGPIX vs. FGKFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProFunds Large Cap Growth ProFund (LGPIX) is 6.85%, while Fidelity Growth Company K6 Fund (FGKFX) has a volatility of 7.66%. This indicates that LGPIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FGKFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LGPIX	FGKFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.85%	7.66%	-0.81%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.73%	15.78%	-2.05%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.02%	19.83%	-2.81%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	40.08%	24.33%	+15.75%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	31.41%	25.79%	+5.62%

LGPIX vs. FGKFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LGPIX has a 1.59% expense ratio, which is higher than FGKFX's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

LGPIX vs. FGKFX - Dividend Comparison

LGPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.37%, while FGKFX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FGKFX Fidelity Growth Company K6 Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.10%	0.18%	2.64%	0.93%	0.06%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
LGPIX ProFunds Large Cap Growth ProFund	1.37%	1.51%	1.14%	1.55%	1.98%	6.65%	3.33%	4.40%	1.84%	0.00%	1.39%	0.06%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LGPIX and FGKFX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.95, LGPIX and FGKFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, LGPIX or FGKFX?

FGKFX has higher volatility (7.66%) compared to LGPIX (6.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LGPIX dropped -78.62% vs FGKFX's -40.14%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FGKFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.