LGO vs. COPX

Last updated Jul 11, 2026

LGO (Largo Resources Ltd) is a stock, while COPX (Global X Copper Miners ETF) is Copper fund tracking the Solactive Global Copper Miners Total Return Index. Over the past 10 years, LGO returned -14.43%/yr vs 18.56%/yr for COPX. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

LGO vs. COPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Largo Resources Ltd (LGO) and Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LGO achieves a -22.10% return, which is significantly lower than COPX's 6.98% return. Over the past 10 years, LGO has underperformed COPX with an annualized return of -14.43%, while COPX has yielded a comparatively higher 18.56% annualized return.

LGO

• 1D: -1.99%
• 1M: -8.74%
• 6M: -38.65%
• YTD: -22.10%
• 1Y: -47.09%
• 3Y*: -45.03%
• 5Y*: -45.65%
• 10Y*: -14.43%

COPX

• 1D: 1.51%
• 1M: -10.67%
• 6M: -0.95%
• YTD: 6.98%
• 1Y: 74.05%
• 3Y*: 28.67%
• 5Y*: 18.00%
• 10Y*: 18.56%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LGO vs. COPX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LGO Largo Resources Ltd	-22.10%	-45.51%	-25.54%	-57.06%	-41.90%	-16.18%	43.48%	-62.79%	93.41%	179.30%
COPX Global X Copper Miners ETF	6.98%	93.50%	3.57%	8.38%	-0.76%	23.39%	51.66%	12.48%	-31.31%	38.92%

Correlation

The correlation between LGO and COPX is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.44
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.39
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.44
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.33
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 20, 2010	0.26

The correlation between LGO and COPX shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (all time) to 0.44 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

LGO vs. COPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LGO

LGO Risk / Return Rank: 25
LGO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
LGO Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
LGO Omega Ratio Rank: 29
LGO Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
LGO Martin Ratio Rank: 24

COPX

COPX Risk / Return Rank: 57
COPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
COPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
COPX Omega Ratio Rank: 53
COPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
COPX Martin Ratio Rank: 53

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LGO vs. COPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Largo Resources Ltd (LGO) and Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LGO	COPX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.49	1.64	-2.12
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.19	2.06	-2.26
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.97	1.27	-0.29
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.62	2.63	-3.25
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.95	7.22	-8.17

LGO vs. COPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LGO Sharpe Ratio is -0.49, which is lower than the COPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LGO and COPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LGO vs. COPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LGO drawdown since its inception was -99.25%, which is greater than COPX's maximum drawdown of -83.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LGO and COPX.

Drawdown Indicators

	LGO	COPX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.25%	-83.16%	-16.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-74.83%	-27.82%	-47.01%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-86.68%	-39.72%	-46.96%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-96.22%	-42.12%	-54.10%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-98.19%	-65.41%	-32.78%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.14%	-19.75%	-79.39%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-81.72%	-39.18%	-42.54%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	48.36%	10.13%	+38.23%

Volatility

LGO vs. COPX - Volatility Comparison

Largo Resources Ltd (LGO) has a higher volatility of 27.76% compared to Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX) at 15.64%. This indicates that LGO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LGO	COPX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	27.76%	15.64%	+12.12%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	61.22%	39.22%	+22.00%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	94.85%	44.75%	+50.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	71.86%	37.14%	+34.72%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	76.81%	35.75%	+41.06%

Dividends

LGO vs. COPX - Dividend Comparison

LGO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while COPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.52%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
COPX Global X Copper Miners ETF	2.52%	2.68%	1.80%	2.39%	3.14%	1.48%	1.30%	1.37%	2.59%	1.57%	0.60%	1.20%
LGO Largo Resources Ltd	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LGO and COPX in my portfolio?

LGO and COPX have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LGO or COPX?

LGO has higher volatility (27.76%) compared to COPX (15.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LGO dropped -99.25% vs COPX's -83.16%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

COPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs -0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.