LGLIX vs. LAMYX
Compare and contrast key facts about Lord Abbett Growth Leaders Fund (LGLIX) and Lord Abbett Dividend Growth Fund (LAMYX).
LGLIX is managed by Lord Abbett. It was launched on Jun 30, 2011. LAMYX is managed by Lord Abbett. It was launched on Dec 27, 2001.
Performance
LGLIX vs. LAMYX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
LGLIX vs. LAMYX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LGLIX Lord Abbett Growth Leaders Fund | -14.54% | 16.49% | 44.97% | 33.29% | -38.73% | 8.62% | 77.55% | 35.02% | -1.08% | 31.64% |
LAMYX Lord Abbett Dividend Growth Fund | -3.24% | 16.44% | 22.61% | 16.66% | -13.29% | 25.76% | 15.80% | 26.91% | -4.52% | 19.42% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LGLIX achieves a -14.54% return, which is significantly lower than LAMYX's -3.24% return. Over the past 10 years, LGLIX has outperformed LAMYX with an annualized return of 15.30%, while LAMYX has yielded a comparatively lower 12.28% annualized return.
LGLIX
- 1D
- -1.78%
- 1M
- -9.21%
- YTD
- -14.54%
- 6M
- -17.40%
- 1Y
- 15.24%
- 3Y*
- 20.47%
- 5Y*
- 5.89%
- 10Y*
- 15.30%
LAMYX
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- -6.99%
- YTD
- -3.24%
- 6M
- -1.14%
- 1Y
- 15.26%
- 3Y*
- 16.26%
- 5Y*
- 10.99%
- 10Y*
- 12.28%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LGLIX vs. LAMYX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LGLIX has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is lower than LAMYX's 0.66% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
LGLIX vs. LAMYX — Risk / Return Rank
LGLIX
LAMYX
LGLIX vs. LAMYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Growth Leaders Fund (LGLIX) and Lord Abbett Dividend Growth Fund (LAMYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LGLIX | LAMYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.55 | 1.06 | -0.51 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.93 | 1.58 | -0.65 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.24 | -0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.54 | 1.38 | -0.84 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.66 | 6.66 | -5.00 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LGLIX | LAMYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 | 1.06 | -0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 | 0.72 | -0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 | 0.73 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.62 | 0.64 | -0.02 |
Correlation
The correlation between LGLIX and LAMYX is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
LGLIX vs. LAMYX - Dividend Comparison
LGLIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.33%, less than LAMYX's 5.16% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LGLIX Lord Abbett Growth Leaders Fund | 2.33% | 1.99% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 23.83% | 9.27% | 8.01% | 19.82% | 6.46% | 0.00% | 4.84% |
LAMYX Lord Abbett Dividend Growth Fund | 5.16% | 5.21% | 5.36% | 1.57% | 6.06% | 8.03% | 3.54% | 6.06% | 9.59% | 8.18% | 8.95% | 9.68% |
Drawdowns
LGLIX vs. LAMYX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LGLIX drawdown since its inception was -45.95%, which is greater than LAMYX's maximum drawdown of -40.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LGLIX and LAMYX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| LGLIX | LAMYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.95% | -40.55% | -5.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.01% | -10.53% | -10.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.95% | -21.95% | -24.00% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.95% | -33.47% | -12.48% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.01% | -7.58% | -13.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.38% | -5.76% | -3.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.80% | 2.18% | +4.62% |
Volatility
LGLIX vs. LAMYX - Volatility Comparison
Lord Abbett Growth Leaders Fund (LGLIX) has a higher volatility of 7.99% compared to Lord Abbett Dividend Growth Fund (LAMYX) at 3.65%. This indicates that LGLIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LAMYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| LGLIX | LAMYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.99% | 3.65% | +4.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.46% | 7.85% | +8.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.65% | 15.49% | +11.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.79% | 15.36% | +10.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.65% | 16.91% | +7.74% |