LAMYX vs. DGRO

In the year-to-date period, LAMYX achieves a 2.13% return, which is significantly higher than DGRO's 1.76% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with LAMYX having a 11.59% annualized return and DGRO not far behind at 11.38%.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

LAMYX has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRO's 0.08% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Dividend Growth Fund (LAMYX) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current LAMYX Sharpe Ratio is 0.81, which is comparable to the DGRO Sharpe Ratio of 0.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LAMYX and DGRO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

LAMYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.28%, more than DGRO's 2.23% yield.

The maximum LAMYX drawdown since its inception was -40.54%, which is greater than DGRO's maximum drawdown of -35.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LAMYX and DGRO.

The current volatility for Lord Abbett Dividend Growth Fund (LAMYX) is 4.04%, while iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) has a volatility of 4.35%. This indicates that LAMYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DGRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.