PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LGGL.L vs. TDGB.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LGGL.L vs. TDGB.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF (LGGL.L) and VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF (TDGB.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

LGGL.L is traded in USD, while TDGB.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the TDGB.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LGGL.L achieves a 9.92% return, which is significantly higher than TDGB.L's 8.65% return.


LGGL.L

1D
0.05%
1M
4.04%
YTD
9.92%
6M
11.05%
1Y
26.06%
3Y*
20.95%
5Y*
12.04%
10Y*

TDGB.L

1D
0.53%
1M
0.06%
YTD
8.65%
6M
12.64%
1Y
28.08%
3Y*
23.22%
5Y*
16.46%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LGGL.L vs. TDGB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
LGGL.L
L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF
9.92%21.17%19.21%25.02%-18.03%21.94%16.35%19.75%
TDGB.L
VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF
8.65%40.76%8.81%14.81%9.40%18.51%-2.72%14.01%

Correlation

The correlation between LGGL.L and TDGB.L is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 21, 2019

0.68

Over the past year, the correlation between LGGL.L and TDGB.L has dropped to 0.46 - well below their long-term average of 0.68, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

LGGL.L vs. TDGB.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
LGGL.L
TDGB.L

Technology

28.4%
0.3%

Financial Services

15.9%
31.7%

Industrials

10.9%
3.9%

Communication Services

9.7%
8.7%

Consumer Cyclical

9.4%
3.8%

Healthcare

8.8%
14.4%

Consumer Defensive

5.3%
10.1%

Energy

4.0%
19.7%

Basic Materials

3.2%
1.2%

Utilities

2.5%
6.2%

Real Estate

1.8%
0.0%

Technology

LGGL.L
28.4%
TDGB.L
0.3%

Financial Services

LGGL.L
15.9%
TDGB.L
31.7%

Industrials

LGGL.L
10.9%
TDGB.L
3.9%

Communication Services

LGGL.L
9.7%
TDGB.L
8.7%

Consumer Cyclical

LGGL.L
9.4%
TDGB.L
3.8%

Healthcare

LGGL.L
8.8%
TDGB.L
14.4%

Consumer Defensive

LGGL.L
5.3%
TDGB.L
10.1%

Energy

LGGL.L
4.0%
TDGB.L
19.7%

Basic Materials

LGGL.L
3.2%
TDGB.L
1.2%

Utilities

LGGL.L
2.5%
TDGB.L
6.2%

Real Estate

LGGL.L
1.8%
TDGB.L
0.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LGGL.L vs. TDGB.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LGGL.L
LGGL.L Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
LGGL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LGGL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
LGGL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
LGGL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
LGGL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

TDGB.L
TDGB.L Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
TDGB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TDGB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
TDGB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
TDGB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
TDGB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LGGL.L vs. TDGB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF (LGGL.L) and VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF (TDGB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LGGL.LTDGB.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.46

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.06

5.52

-2.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.14

15.71

-2.57

LGGL.L vs. TDGB.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LGGL.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.18, which is comparable to the TDGB.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LGGL.L and TDGB.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LGGL.LTDGB.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.18

2.53

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

1.16

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.82

0.88

-0.06

Drawdowns

LGGL.L vs. TDGB.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LGGL.L drawdown since its inception was -33.89%, smaller than the maximum TDGB.L drawdown of -37.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LGGL.L and TDGB.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LGGL.LTDGB.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.89%

-37.43%

+3.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.44%

-5.06%

-3.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.81%

-13.67%

-4.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.76%

-18.93%

-6.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.44%

-1.86%

+1.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.97%

-4.33%

-0.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.97%

1.78%

+0.19%

Volatility

LGGL.L vs. TDGB.L - Volatility Comparison

L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF (LGGL.L) has a higher volatility of 3.30% compared to VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF (TDGB.L) at 2.78%. This indicates that LGGL.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TDGB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LGGL.LTDGB.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.30%

2.78%

+0.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.21%

8.06%

+1.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.88%

11.05%

+0.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.58%

14.21%

+1.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.16%

16.79%

+0.37%

LGGL.L vs. TDGB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

LGGL.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than TDGB.L's 0.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

LGGL.L vs. TDGB.L - Dividend Comparison

LGGL.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TDGB.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.20%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
LGGL.L
L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TDGB.L
VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF
3.20%3.50%4.27%4.93%4.40%4.06%4.16%4.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


LGGL.L and TDGB.L have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LGGL.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LGGL.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for TDGB.L.

LGGL.L tracks Solactive Core Developed Markets Large & Mid Cap USD Index NTR, while TDGB.L tracks Morningstar Developed Markets Large Cap Dividend Leaders Screened Select Index. They also come from different issuers: L&G and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for LGGL.L and 0.38% for TDGB.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LGGL.L and TDGB.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer