TDGB.L vs. VHYD.L
Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF (TDGB.L) and Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF USD Distributing (VHYD.L).
TDGB.L and VHYD.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. TDGB.L is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the Morningstar Developed Markets Large Cap Dividend Leaders Screened Select Index. It was launched on May 23, 2016. VHYD.L is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield Index. It was launched on Sep 24, 2019. Both TDGB.L and VHYD.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: TDGB.L or VHYD.L.
Correlation
The correlation between TDGB.L and VHYD.L is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
TDGB.L vs. VHYD.L - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
TDGB.L:
1.38
VHYD.L:
1.42
TDGB.L:
13.79
VHYD.L:
1.97
TDGB.L:
2.79
VHYD.L:
1.25
TDGB.L:
19.41
VHYD.L:
2.13
TDGB.L:
54.72
VHYD.L:
5.94
TDGB.L:
1.96%
VHYD.L:
2.43%
TDGB.L:
77.43%
VHYD.L:
10.12%
TDGB.L:
-37.34%
VHYD.L:
-36.60%
TDGB.L:
-0.45%
VHYD.L:
-0.25%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TDGB.L achieves a 8.44% return, which is significantly higher than VHYD.L's 6.25% return.
TDGB.L
8.44%
2.08%
11.17%
108.59%
43.23%
N/A
VHYD.L
6.25%
2.85%
4.68%
15.03%
8.07%
6.51%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TDGB.L vs. VHYD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
TDGB.L has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than VHYD.L's 0.29% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
TDGB.L vs. VHYD.L — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
TDGB.L
VHYD.L
TDGB.L vs. VHYD.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF (TDGB.L) and Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF USD Distributing (VHYD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
TDGB.L vs. VHYD.L - Dividend Comparison
TDGB.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 190.27%, more than VHYD.L's 2.96% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TDGB.L VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF | 190.27% | 206.32% | 52.52% | 4.40% | 4.06% | 4.16% | 3.90% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VHYD.L Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF USD Distributing | 2.96% | 3.15% | 3.31% | 3.72% | 3.14% | 2.90% | 3.23% | 3.77% | 2.96% | 3.16% | 3.32% | 3.82% |
Drawdowns
TDGB.L vs. VHYD.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TDGB.L drawdown since its inception was -37.34%, roughly equal to the maximum VHYD.L drawdown of -36.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TDGB.L and VHYD.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
TDGB.L vs. VHYD.L - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF (TDGB.L) has a higher volatility of 2.66% compared to Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF USD Distributing (VHYD.L) at 2.06%. This indicates that TDGB.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VHYD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.